LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2012, 06:43 AM   #1
tessx
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: strasbourg
Distribution: RH 9.2
Posts: 43

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question Is it worth upgrading my desktop pc?


Hi All,

I have an old pc with a AMD Athlon XP 1500+ cpu and 768Mb of ram.
It's running fedora 14 with KDE 4, but as soon as I open more than say 5 windows the system becomes rather slow. I don't need to buy a new pc, as I don't use it for work. In any case I could upgrade it up with 3GB of ram and a XP 2700+ cpu (the max the motherboard allows) within the budget I am willing to spend. Do you reckon it will make a significant change? Which upgrade is going to have the most noticeable effects? The ram or the cpu?

I am not aiming at having a spectacular machine, I'd just like to have a more snappy system for casual use. (I know I could switch to a different wm etc, but I'll consider that if people here tell me it's not worth upgrading this machine).

Thanks,

tessx
 
Old 01-19-2012, 07:08 AM   #2
Larry Webb
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Crystal Beach, Texas
Distribution: Suse for mail +
Posts: 5,100
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
Up grading the ram should do more than the cpu.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 07:17 AM   #3
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Your favorite system monitor (top, gnome-system-monitor, etc) will give you useful data. If your RAM use is high then more RAM will help, if your CPU is high then a better CPU will help.

Personally I would not put money into an old machine; I would save that money toward my next computer purchase. Due to Moore's law it is an exponentially better investment; that's just my philosophy anyway.

For old machines I try to improve their performance not with hardware upgrades but with software tweaks, for example using a "lightweight" distro like SliTaz, AntiX, CrunchBang, and/or a DE/WM like Xfce, LXDE, Fluxbox. (Since Fedora 14 is now obosolete, this is a great time for you to transition.) Really there are so many optimizations available: for example simply installing ad-block, flash-block, and noscript in your web browser will give an enormous perceived performance boost. Or simply don't open 6 apps at once, that is the simplest solution to your problem.

Last edited by snowday; 01-19-2012 at 07:19 AM.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 09:45 AM   #4
tessx
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: strasbourg
Distribution: RH 9.2
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for your replies!

OK for a start when I mean 5 windows, I mean 5 instances of Kwrite! That's enough to slow the machine.
I might go for the ram update and see how it goes, there is no point really for me to buy a new machine in the near future. I guess I can try a combination of hardware + software tweaks!

Cheers,

tessx
 
Old 01-19-2012, 09:51 AM   #5
linus72
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: Slack14.2/Many
Posts: 5,573

Rep: Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470
I highly recommend you use a light-weight WM like fluxbox, openbox, etc
make sure you only have services turned on that are needed

except for the 1500 vs 2400, I have almost the exact same PC as yours and have many distros all running light WM's, also have a 1.6GHz athlonXP-M lappy and it runs fluxbox and hardly ever gets bogged down.
no matter whats open it hardly ever slows or goes above 300MB ram

[root@nfluxos guest]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1995.000
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up
bogomips : 3994.57
clflush size : 32
cache_alignment : 32
address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management: ts
 
Old 01-19-2012, 09:58 AM   #6
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Kwrite is described as a "lightweight text editor" so it shouldn't slow your computer down that much. Again I really recommend using the system monitor to find out what's bogging down your computer. Specific information/data will help you troubleshoot the problem rationally.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:35 AM   #7
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,925
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159
Member response

Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by tessx View Post
Hi All,

I have an old pc with a AMD Athlon XP 1500+ cpu and 768Mb of ram.
It's running fedora 14 with KDE 4, but as soon as I open more than say 5 windows the system becomes rather slow. I don't need to buy a new pc, as I don't use it for work. In any case I could upgrade it up with 3GB of ram and a XP 2700+ cpu (the max the motherboard allows) within the budget I am willing to spend. Do you reckon it will make a significant change? Which upgrade is going to have the most noticeable effects? The ram or the cpu?

I am not aiming at having a spectacular machine, I'd just like to have a more snappy system for casual use. (I know I could switch to a different wm etc, but I'll consider that if people here tell me it's not worth upgrading this machine).

Thanks,

tessx
The cost of upgrade for the RAM & CPU should be justified as to how much longer you wish to use this PC. Along with which Gnu/Linux & DE to be used.

Bump the RAM by using a reseller like: Computer Geeks or the like. You should be able to get pulls at a reasonable cost. That class of CPU could be had for under $10US. RAM should be around $30/GB or cheaper for pulls for that system. Recyclers do provide some good avenues to upgrade your system cheaply so I would get the CPU & RAM if you intend to keep the machine longer.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:39 AM   #8
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by tessx View Post
I might go for the ram update and see how it goes
Totally wrong approach. If your car wouldn't drive like it is intended to would you buy random spare parts and see if the issue is fixed?
I recommend to follow snowpine's suggestion. If you don't know how to find the culprit we can help you, of course.
As a start, just start the applications until the machine slows down, then open a terminal, launch the command
Code:
free -m
and post the output here.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:41 AM   #9
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,624

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
if you are going to keep the same base hardware add some ram

but do not spend much soon you WILL want a new box

but in the mean time CentOS6.2 or RHEL 6.2 will run just fine on that
I have ScientificLinux 6.x full Gnome3/kde4 running just fine on a 11 year old Pentium 4 box with 1 gig of ram
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:51 AM   #10
otoomet
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tartu, Århus,Nürnberg, Europe
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 619

Rep: Reputation: 45
Which type of RAM does your computer need? This summer I realized that DDR1 (for a comparable old machine) was about 3x more expensive than DDR2 as both are out of production but there are still more DDR2 blocks around. So I would be conservative in installing new rather expensive DDR1-s which you later only can sell on e-bay for a change...
 
Old 01-19-2012, 12:17 PM   #11
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,624

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
the price that is why i only put 1 gig ( added 512 more) on my old dell from 2001
the cost for 2 gigs was a new bargain basement computer
 
Old 01-19-2012, 03:22 PM   #12
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,925
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159
Member response

Hi,

That is one reason to use a local reseller/recyclers to keep the cost down. Pulls are a lot cheaper than new. Be it CPU or RAM you will pay a fraction of the cost for new. My money is on DDR for the OP's class of machine.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 03:29 PM   #13
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
My money is on DDR for the OP's class of machine.
Mine too. For an Athlon XP there is a small chance that it uses SDR-DRAM, but most likely it will be DDR-SDRAM.
 
Old 01-19-2012, 08:22 PM   #14
Larry Webb
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Crystal Beach, Texas
Distribution: Suse for mail +
Posts: 5,100
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
Hi,

That is one reason to use a local reseller/recyclers to keep the cost down. Pulls are a lot cheaper than new. Be it CPU or RAM you will pay a fraction of the cost for new. My money is on DDR for the OP's class of machine.
In our area schools are replacing their computers and selling their old pentium D850 1gig for 69 USD that I have set up in retirement homes. I can upgrade to 2 gig ram for an additional 15 USD.

With prices like that you can not afford to upgrade older sets.
 
Old 01-20-2012, 08:58 AM   #15
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by tessx View Post
... a AMD Athlon XP 1500+ cpu and 768Mb of ram...
It's running fedora 14 with KDE 4,
KDE 4 (an early KDE 4, at that, which may have memory leaks, as well as not having the improved kwin) and limited memory is unlikely to be a good recipe. You should measure things (or look at the disk drive light... ), but it is a fair bet that you are starting to swap before you have many windows open, even if they are for relatively lightweight apps.

With this kind of workload, a lighter wm could easily help, but I'd want to fix the computer; YMMV.

Check whether you are swapping (ie, traffic as seen in vmstat, free -m isn't all that helpful in that it gives an amount of swap used, and it is traffic that slows you down...although, if you do have extreme amounts of swap used, it is difficult to do this without causing traffic), and if you are, there is no point in upgrading the CPU unless you also increase the amount of memory.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worth upgrading to Slackware 12.1? simonb1975uk Slackware 9 07-30-2008 12:20 AM
Is Upgrading to 8.04 Worth It and Safe? taurusx5 Linux - Software 2 04-30-2008 06:52 PM
Is upgrading to X11 8.6.1 worth it? DreameR-X Slackware 5 12-18-2004 08:24 PM
kde 3.2 -> is it worth upgrading? ferreter Slackware 23 03-04-2004 12:14 PM
Worth upgrading? r_jensen11 Slackware 2 09-06-2003 11:30 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration