LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


View Poll Results: INTEL VS AMD ?
INTEL QUAD,DUO CORE 6 19.35%
AMD QUAD,DUO CORE 25 80.65%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2007, 06:19 AM   #1
pleasehelpme
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Taipei TAIWAN
Distribution: live cd
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
Smile INTEL OR AMD Processor ? and what's the different ?


INTEL OR AMD Processor ? and what's the different ?

Intel quad core cpu vs AMD quad core cpu ?

Intel pentium 4 1.6f cpu vs AMD Sempron 2800+ ??

Will you spend more money to invest in INTEL cpu than AMD's CPU ?

WHY ???
 
Old 12-05-2007, 08:45 AM   #2
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,241
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
AMD quad core currently has an issue.. this posting just showed up on slashdot today..
http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13721
http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13724

I'd wait till the next CPU revision before buying a quad core AMD at this point..
yes there are workarounds and patches to address the issue.. but...
 
Old 12-05-2007, 03:17 PM   #3
strick1226
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, Fedora, OS X, SLES, Ubuntu
Posts: 327

Rep: Reputation: 63
AMD's initial dual-core CPU's were much better than those from Intel. Mainly due to much lower power consumption (and heat!), performance taken into consideration of price, and true 64-bit memory addressing (important for servers). The Opteron server-class CPU's were much more competitive than Intel's Xeons of the time. The reduced heat output made them particularly popular with the 1U "pizza box" rackmount servers.

The current round of quad-core CPU's definitely seems to have Intel's choices coming out on top, from everything I've seen. They overclock beautifully, on average, and have had less compatibility problems overall.

If you absolutely have to buy something now I probably would have to recommend an Intel Core2 Quad Q6600.

Or, you could wait and see what happens in the first quarter of 2008...
 
Old 12-17-2007, 03:18 AM   #4
rhomp2002
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: jamaica, ny
Distribution: ubuntu, sabayon, slackware, bluewhite64, wolvix
Posts: 45

Rep: Reputation: 15
Have had both and while I love my current Intel Duo Core I had many fewer problems with the AMD Duo Core. I will be looking to replace my Intel with the AMD in the future but for now I will keep on with the Intel.
 
Old 12-17-2007, 06:14 AM   #5
Electro
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I would pick AMD Athlon64 X2 processors over Intel Core 2 Duo. The reason, I sometimes get hangs upon booting up Linux on an Intel Core 2 Duo (T7300). Also Intel Core 2 Duo can not run 64-bit programs well as AMD Athlon64 X2 processors.

My next system will be AMD, but it will be dual-core versions. I do not have money to buy a complete AMD system at this time even though they are a lot cheaper.

It is a shame that the K10 processors did not do to well and they seem they are still in the prototype stage.

If your present system is a Pentium 4 1.6 GHz, then any system you buy AMD or Intel will be extremely fast compared to that. An AMD Sempron will beat a Pentium 4 1.6 GHz easily and consume a lot less power.
 
Old 12-17-2007, 07:30 AM   #6
av03
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
I choose AMD, more to the quality : prices where it's all reaosnable for me to choose an AMD platform more than Intel Platform, even the quality benchmark between two merk is now held by Intel Pentium.
But for what I see, the price is main issue, and the quality that is what i questioned here, for what quality such as that, I use my SUSE 10.1 on AMD sempron 1800+ on socket 754 and RAM 1 GB, and it runs very smooth than if using a windows XP SP2, and frankly doing the samething watch anime, write a report, listening to mp3, and play a refreshing games (in win freecell, in Linux there's so much so I can't remember what I've played)...
Quality like Quad core, to me is a wasted technology if u're doing the same thing to me.......
 
Old 01-04-2008, 01:03 AM   #7
rg.viza
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by farslayer View Post
AMD quad core currently has an issue.. this posting just showed up on slashdot today..
http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13721
http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13724

I'd wait till the next CPU revision before buying a quad core AMD at this point..
yes there are workarounds and patches to address the issue.. but...
This was on Tom's hardware December 19. The Phenom is bugged. They are faster but only by about 10% more than an X2. If you look at the price difference you'll understand why this is a raw deal. It's referred to as the "L3 TLD bug" by the guy on Tom's hardware:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/...x2/page17.html

(second paragraph)

AMD will get it together. It's a brand new chip architecture. At least the initial release is functional. I just feel sorry for the people that buy them. I smell a class action...

The good news is if you have an enthusiast AM2 board (typically with the AMD 790FX chipset you are good) that can handle 105 watts, you can pop your old cpu out and plug one of these in, once they get it right, supposedly. The BIOS has to be pretty recent. If it's more than a few months old, and there's no new version available, you are SOL.

Up to 3 video cards with that chipset. Nasty...

Also there is a linux workaround already making it's way up the kernel tree 8)
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/...uadcore_b.html

-Viz

Last edited by rg.viza; 01-04-2008 at 01:11 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core DUO processor Vs AMD garfield1228 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 01-10-2008 07:12 PM
AMD or INTEL:which processor better for linux(ubuntu) anirudh.iitm Linux - Newbie 2 06-30-2006 11:41 PM
Best processor under $80? Intel or AMD Running a small server/workstation Fendbass22 Linux - General 1 03-10-2006 12:09 PM
Which Processor on Linux- AMD or Intel? bnchakraborty Linux - Hardware 10 03-22-2004 04:28 PM
AMD processor eric Linux - General 5 05-19-2002 09:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration