LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2009, 02:19 PM   #16
AuroraCA
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Northern CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Slackware, Gentoo, Fedora, Red Hat, Puppy Linux
Posts: 370

Rep: Reputation: 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by amani View Post
I have such a 500GB Barracuda ST3500320AS. After the latest update (this month), the problem is not fully solved. This was a replacement(RMA) for the same model with the same firmware... (it was actually a firmware problem).
If you go to the Seagate website and check that model number you will see that it is not listed as one with a firmware problem.

So your report is purely anecdotal.

I have two of the same drive running in a RAID1 array in a busy server without problems.

Last edited by AuroraCA; 02-09-2009 at 02:24 PM.
 
Old 02-09-2009, 03:57 PM   #17
amani
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: Debian 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,766

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuroraCA View Post
If you go to the Seagate website and check that model number you will see that it is not listed as one with a firmware problem.

So your report is purely anecdotal.

I have two of the same drive running in a RAID1 array in a busy server without problems.

I checked with the Model No (ST3500320AS) and then the serial number and was informed that the drive is affected. I have changed the firmware to SD1A (from SD15) and there are a few odd messages from that drive. The other seagate sata drive does not show similar messages.
Changing the SATA port does not help.
The drive works fine, though...

Quote:
[ 16.216718] ata4.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x90202 action 0xe frozen
[ 16.216727] ata4.00: irq_stat 0x00400000, PHY RDY changed
[ 16.216730] ata4: SError: { RecovComm Persist PHYRdyChg 10B8B }
[ 16.216735] ata4.00: cmd 60/07:00:37:32:7c/00:00:19:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 3584 in
[ 16.216737] res 40/00:00:36:32:7c/00:00:19:00:00/40 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
[ 16.216740] ata4.00: status: { DRDY }
[ 16.216745] ata4: hard resetting link
[ 23.152021] ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
[ 23.600030] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[ 23.624369] ata4: hard resetting link
[ 25.116030] ata4: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[ 29.888319] ata4.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100)
[ 29.888321] ata4.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
 
Old 02-09-2009, 04:48 PM   #18
dv502
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: USA - NYC
Distribution: Whatever icon you see!
Posts: 642

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 57
Update

I've checked my BIOS and I have two SATA ports SATA0 and SATA1. The SATA mode offered is IDE. No raid. This is fine because I don't need raid support at this moment.

The modes offer for SATA IDE are Combined, Enchanced and Sata only.

I will go with Enchanced mode ( allows both SATA and PATA ) drives.

Is this setup fine with linux or do I need to have raid, AHCI mode support for the SATA drive to work?

If anyone says this is fine, then I will go ahead and buy a SATA drive.

Thanks in advance!

Last edited by dv502; 02-09-2009 at 04:54 PM.
 
Old 02-09-2009, 04:58 PM   #19
amani
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: Debian 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,766

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv502 View Post
Update

The modes offer for SATA IDE are Combined, Enchanced and Sata only.

I will go with Enchanced mode ( allows both SATA and PATA ) drives.

Is this setup fine with linux or do I need to have raid, AHCI mode support?

Thanks in advance!

Why enhanced? Are you going to use a PATA drive on that (with a IDE to SATA converter)?

Anything is OK with Linux
 
Old 02-09-2009, 05:32 PM   #20
dv502
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: USA - NYC
Distribution: Whatever icon you see!
Posts: 642

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 57
I chosen Enchance mode because of the brief description in the BIOS. It says it allows us to use both SATA and PATA devices. Does Enchanced mode means using an IDE adaptor/converter to a SATA port. If this is what it means, this is not what I want. I will be using a real SATA drive.


This is how my system is currently setup. My hard drive is the Primary Master and my DVD drive is the primary slave on IDE0. I want to keep these drives where they are.

I want to add a new drive, a SATA drive to port SATA0. And I want this to be the primary master and be the first in the boot order.

Which SATA IDE mode should I use: Combined, Enchanced, Auto or Sata only for the setup I wish to use?

Last edited by dv502; 02-09-2009 at 05:40 PM.
 
Old 02-09-2009, 07:54 PM   #21
dv502
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: USA - NYC
Distribution: Whatever icon you see!
Posts: 642

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 57
I'm going to experiment with the modes and see the results that follow.

Experience is the best teacher.

Thanks for the replies everybody

Last edited by dv502; 02-09-2009 at 07:57 PM.
 
Old 02-10-2009, 02:57 AM   #22
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv502 View Post
I want to add a new drive, a SATA drive to port SATA0. And I want this to be the primary master and be the first in the boot order.

Which SATA IDE mode should I use: Combined, Enchanced, Auto or Sata only for the setup I wish to use?
For SATA there is no notion of master or slave. As for the mode, I would use AHCI, it's most likely to work without problems, but you can also use PATA if the drivers are available.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sata drive being recogniced as IDE??? abefroman Linux - Hardware 10 10-28-2008 02:06 AM
Clone a dual booting IDE hard drive to a SATA hard drive namida12 Linux - Distributions 1 07-14-2008 10:01 AM
IDE to SATA Drive Upgrade major.tom Slackware 14 06-18-2008 10:17 PM
hard drive advice (raid 1 sata) rblampain Linux - Hardware 2 09-15-2007 12:19 AM
install xp on ide drive, ubuntu on sata drive abrahammer Ubuntu 5 07-29-2007 11:57 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration