LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2012, 09:28 AM   #16
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 12,875
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163Reputation: 2163
Member response


Hi,

I would use a ramdisk at the sacrifice of some memory. Or you could get dedicated ramdisk to place in the system.

SSD – System Cache Set Up Guide may help if you happen to be using Intel SSD. I am sure you can find information for other manufactures.

Another good article: SSD Caching versus Tiering understand caching techniques.

HTH!
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:41 AM   #17
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,144
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846Reputation: 4846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses_ View Post
Maybe a small SSD is faster than a large SSD for the same money?
Normally it is the other way around. Larger SSDs are usually faster, because they have more Flash chips that can be interleaved for better performance.

Quote:
I would use a ramdisk at the sacrifice of some memory.
That is what I do. Works fine.

@Ulysses: You wanted an advice about the system with the most performance storage subsystem, regardless of cost. Here is mine: Use RAM for the tasks that need the most performance and fit into RAM (compiling large pieces of software in RAM is not a problem on a machine with 16GB). Use the SSD for storing your OS and tasks that need performance, but fit not into RAM (like your VMs). Use a second, mechanical, disk for storage and tasks that do not need a lot of performance.
This way you will get the best performance.

Last edited by TobiSGD; 04-09-2012 at 09:42 AM.
 
Old 04-09-2012, 10:17 AM   #18
Ulysses_
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,081

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
This is useful information, and surprising regarding small v. large SSD performance. One thing to note though: I have an old laptop with plenty of ram, about 3 times the ram given to each VM, and when one VM is running, the host operating system uses about half the remaining ram for disk cacheing, and if this VM is booted with more ram forcing the host cache to get smaller, guess what happens to VM disk performance. VM disk performance improves with a smaller host cache! So ramdisks are probably a bad idea for the host, any spare ram is handled better if given to the VM and the VM takes care of disk cacheing better.

SSD as a cache has a second advantage over ramdisks: it is persistent so when you power up the laptop it should boot as fast as if you're booting from an SSD. Is it?

Last edited by Ulysses_; 04-09-2012 at 02:46 PM.
 
Old 04-09-2012, 10:30 AM   #19
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288
Another thing to look into is zcache. I've used it for a while and it boosts performance significantly, especially during heavy disk I/O. It lets you use RAM more efficiently, and reduces disk I/O. It plus other patches have solved issues with I/O hogging for me.
 
Old 04-09-2012, 02:49 PM   #20
Ulysses_
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,081

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
It plus other patches have solved issues with I/O hogging for me.
Any links for those patches?
 
Old 04-10-2012, 04:00 AM   #21
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288Reputation: 1288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses_ View Post
Any links for those patches?
The patches were merged with the kernel above 3.2, so just use a kernel above that.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Redhat 9.0 installation problem in laptops with sata hard drive...... fretboardwarrior Linux - Hardware 10 05-19-2009 09:54 PM
Laptops hard drive had another oopsie.... shuego Linux - Software 5 08-03-2006 08:40 AM
Hard drive issues: common problem with Linux on laptops ? JamesD99 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 4 01-12-2006 03:58 AM
hard drive performance true_atlantis Linux - General 3 10-26-2004 03:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration