Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
09-09-2003, 12:02 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
GEARS score with RADEON 9800
Can anyone tell me if this is normal?
My scores are the following:
360 frames in 5.001 seconds = 71.986 FPS
363 frames in 5.010 seconds = 72.455 FPS
362 frames in 5.002 seconds = 72.371 FPS
359 frames in 5.010 seconds = 71.657 FPS
364 frames in 5.010 seconds = 72.655 FPS
328 frames in 5.002 seconds = 65.574 FPS
306 frames in 5.008 seconds = 61.102 FPS
351 frames in 5.003 seconds = 70.158 FPS
Isn't that a little slow?
What's your score?
B0mbtruck
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 04:35 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042
Rep:
|
It looks like you are using software 3D rendering.
If you have Mandrake 9.1 or Redhat 9. Downgrade to X86Free 4.2.1 and use ATI drivers. If you don't want to do that you can try Gatos packages.
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 06:54 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Geneva
Distribution: SuSE 8.2; Kernel 2.4.20; XFree86 4.3
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
I reach 12000 frames in 5 sec with my Nvidia GeForce3 ti 200
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 07:20 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Type glxinfo and it will show you what is going on.
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 05:19 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Romania
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
:)))
I have something about 1200 whith a radeon 8500
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 05:37 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Italy
Distribution: Linux Mint 17 Xfce
Posts: 295
Rep:
|
Nearly 500 with a radeon 7000, @ 1024x768 16bpp. With 24 bpp, something like 280.
But aren't nvidia drivers closed source?
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 05:44 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mtb
.
But aren't nvidia drivers closed source?
|
Like I care - they work.Thats all that matters to me.
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 11:11 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 41
Rep:
|
I get more than 12000 FPS on my Radeon 8500 using the fglrx drivers from ATI. I can get more detailed numbers later if anyone is interrested. BTW: I use XFree86 4.3 on a Debian sid system.
Last edited by JOPS; 09-10-2003 at 11:12 AM.
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 04:28 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
|
I admire all you guys as you got your video cards to work.
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 08:18 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
Are these scores based on running glxgears in maximized, full-screen mode, or in a much smaller, say, 2" by 2" window? The smaller the window, the higher the score, and in order to compare apples to apples I would think these numbers would only have meaning if they reflected full-screen mode. FWIW, the highest rate I've been able to get in full-screen mode is about 1400, on an ATI board, which seems pretty anemic compared to these other scores. -- J.W.
|
|
|
09-10-2003, 10:31 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577
Rep:
|
1024x768 16bpp
this is my tux racer settings
I average 2500 FPS while playing..........damn good for
a 32 meg vid board.
|
|
|
09-11-2003, 05:57 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by J.W.
Are these scores based on running glxgears in maximized, full-screen mode, or in a much smaller, say, 2" by 2" window? The smaller the window, the higher the score, and in order to compare apples to apples I would think these numbers would only have meaning if they reflected full-screen mode.
|
Thats right - plus glxgears isn't a benchmark.It's just meant to check if your 3d acceleration is working.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|