LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2009, 04:11 PM   #1
km4hr
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
Full Capacity of New Hard Drive Isn't Recognized. Why Not?


My laptop came with a 60GB drive. It pooped out so I bought a new drive. The smallest drive available at Best Buy was 160GB. When installed it in my PC it only registers about 140GB. I'm happy with that much GB. But my question is, where are the missing GB? Will this situation cause problems in the future? Or is it ok to use it this way?
 
Old 03-12-2009, 04:15 PM   #2
Lee_Ball
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Manchester (UK)
Distribution: Fedora CentOS
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 18
What is registering 140GB? Your OS, your BIOS?
 
Old 03-12-2009, 04:30 PM   #3
lazlow
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,362

Rep: Reputation: 172Reputation: 172
Probably two things going on. First they sell HD by 1000MB/GB instead of 1024, so you loose some there. Assuming you are running EXT3 (standard for most installs) it reserves 5% for system use(root only) and you have the overhead for the journal.
 
Old 03-12-2009, 06:29 PM   #4
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 130Reputation: 130
Yeah, that's it. Drives are always 7% smaller than you think. And then you lose more space when you format although the exact amount can be manipulated (tune2fs -m command).
 
Old 03-13-2009, 04:01 AM   #5
Lee_Ball
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Manchester (UK)
Distribution: Fedora CentOS
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 18
The bits to bytes conversion didn't used to make much difference, but now drives are getting much larger, you actually appear to "lose" quite a bit.
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:13 AM   #6
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,864
Blog Entries: 14

Rep: Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638Reputation: 1638
Hi,

There are no loses. The hdd space is 1024 not 1000 X the specified space (i.e; 60,80, 100 etc.) to calculate the space. Also remember that space will be allocated too root along with journaled space support if your filesystem happens to be a journaled FS.

Loads of people fall into this trap.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I can't access the full capacity of my hard disk urpion Linux - Newbie 5 10-20-2008 01:04 PM
windows/linux hard drive capacity Vensan Linux - Hardware 2 01-19-2007 10:39 AM
why win98 shows the full capacity of drive in part of which i installed linux? sonisumit84 SUSE / openSUSE 3 01-19-2007 10:19 AM
HP T4 (t4000) 4/8gb Tape Drive not using full capacity k41184 Linux - Hardware 0 12-06-2005 08:05 PM
Hard Drive capacity twantrd Linux - General 2 10-12-2004 02:04 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration