Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-07-2003, 08:38 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Rep:
|
fglrx and linux 2.5.67
Has anyone been able to get the fglrx drivers (for the ati radeon 9700 pro) to compile for a 2.5.x series kernel?
|
|
|
04-08-2003, 11:59 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
There's so many extreme changes to AGP in the 2.5.x codebase that its doubtful the ATI drivers are going to compile straight, my best guess, mail ATI, they've got to have a 2.5.x port by now... maybe you can get into a beta test group of some sort.
Cheers,
Finegan
|
|
|
04-08-2003, 01:24 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Qc, Canada
Distribution: CRUX
Posts: 317
Rep:
|
The "extreme change" in the way the newer 2.5 handles modules in general seems to be the biggest issue.
Lots of "deprecated" warnings in relation with module.h when I tried to compile fglrx.o.
But Finegan has a point, I can't even build a working agp module for the kernel anyway, don't bring errors at build nor when inserted but is just unusable, all the rest is fine.
Tried .65 .65-ac2 and .66, same results.
|
|
|
04-08-2003, 08:28 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Original Poster
Rep:
|
well I compiled the agp module... loaded it... it detected the chipset and the aperture size... but I'm not gonna no if it works until I get fglrx compiled.
I sent an email to ati... we'll see if they respond.
|
|
|
04-14-2003, 03:38 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by finegan
There's so many extreme changes to AGP in the 2.5.x codebase that its doubtful the ATI drivers are going to compile straight, my best guess, mail ATI, they've got to have a 2.5.x port by now... maybe you can get into a beta test group of some sort.
Cheers,
Finegan
|
well emailed them... no response... gonna try and hack the fglrx module myself.
let you know how it goes
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|