LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2003, 08:38 PM   #1
jpbarto
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251

Rep: Reputation: 45
fglrx and linux 2.5.67


Has anyone been able to get the fglrx drivers (for the ati radeon 9700 pro) to compile for a 2.5.x series kernel?
 
Old 04-08-2003, 11:59 AM   #2
finegan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 72
There's so many extreme changes to AGP in the 2.5.x codebase that its doubtful the ATI drivers are going to compile straight, my best guess, mail ATI, they've got to have a 2.5.x port by now... maybe you can get into a beta test group of some sort.

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 04-08-2003, 01:24 PM   #3
UnTamed
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Qc, Canada
Distribution: CRUX
Posts: 317

Rep: Reputation: 30
The "extreme change" in the way the newer 2.5 handles modules in general seems to be the biggest issue.
Lots of "deprecated" warnings in relation with module.h when I tried to compile fglrx.o.
But Finegan has a point, I can't even build a working agp module for the kernel anyway, don't bring errors at build nor when inserted but is just unusable, all the rest is fine.
Tried .65 .65-ac2 and .66, same results.
 
Old 04-08-2003, 08:28 PM   #4
jpbarto
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
well I compiled the agp module... loaded it... it detected the chipset and the aperture size... but I'm not gonna no if it works until I get fglrx compiled.

I sent an email to ati... we'll see if they respond.
 
Old 04-14-2003, 03:38 PM   #5
jpbarto
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally posted by finegan
There's so many extreme changes to AGP in the 2.5.x codebase that its doubtful the ATI drivers are going to compile straight, my best guess, mail ATI, they've got to have a 2.5.x port by now... maybe you can get into a beta test group of some sort.

Cheers,

Finegan
well emailed them... no response... gonna try and hack the fglrx module myself.

let you know how it goes
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fglrx 8.14.13 + 2.6.12.2 xushi Slackware 28 07-16-2005 02:59 AM
Fglrx console=>X changing problem and fglrx resume zbychdm Linux - Hardware 2 09-21-2004 12:58 PM
ATI, linux, and fglrx coyote399 Linux - Software 8 05-20-2004 05:04 AM
fglrx-4.3.0-3.7.6.i386.rpm - ATI Linux 3D Driver darkshadow0001 Linux - Newbie 8 04-29-2004 01:45 PM
ATI 9500, fglrx-glc22-4.1.0, fglrx-glc22-4.2.0, fglrx-glc22-4.3.0 ctrl_alt_delx Linux - Hardware 1 09-30-2003 05:48 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration