@SalmonEater, they look nice, where were you when I was shopping? Anyway, I've got it now and I'm sticking with it...
@Frankbell, Ubuntu has a prog called "Disk Utility" where I found my devices address thingy, output of sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb1 is
Code:
Disk /dev/sdb1: 2000.4 GB, 2000395698176 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243200 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x69205244
This doesn't look like a partition table
Probably you selected the wrong device.
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1p1 ? 13578 119522 850995205 72 Unknown
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb1p2 ? 45382 79243 271987362 74 Unknown
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb1p3 ? 10499 10499 0 65 Novell Netware 386
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb1p4 167628 167631 25817+ 0 Empty
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
Partition table entries are not in disk order
and this is what I get when I just fdisk sdb
Code:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000396746752 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0002de0f
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 243202 1953513560 7 HPFS/NTFS
So, it looks like there's 4 partitions, which is odd, I've not messed about with partitioning on it at all. If this is going to get messy, I think I should perhaps backup, but then again, I don't think there's anything on there that's totally vital. Let's see what more suggestions come my way, hopefully it'll be a doddle to fix.
I had to install gparted, seems it's not standard on Ubuntu, and after pressing various buttons on it, I backed away, it will it seems, happily create a new partition table for me, but at the expense of wiping the data, I'm not ready to lose that yet, there are surely other tricks to try.
ntfsprogs is on there, although it's all command line stuff isn't it, not just type in ntfsprogs and go to a gui... if it's useful, and it does look it, I'd like to know what to use from it
mkfs.ntfs, mkntfs, mount.ntfs-fuse, ntfscat, ntfsclone, ntfscluster, ntfscmp, ntfscp, ntfsfix, ntfsinfo, ntfslabel, ntfsls, ntfsmount, ntfsresize, ntfsundelete
are the possibilities. I get a bit nervy when thinking about even starting one of them in case it just does bad stuff merely because I started it.