Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
10-03-2020, 06:04 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,418
|
Disk Diagnosis? Whassup, if anything?
This is a 500G 2.5" platter disk which I'm using as a backup disk on /dev/sdb1. So it normally gets block copies or rsync jobs. Now some disk fault turned up and it got treated by e2fsck which did stuff, as it usually does. Then, next day (today) I get this
Code:
[mount /dev/sdb1
[ 8146.891969] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x08
[ 8146.893704] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
[ 8146.895424] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
[ 8146.897148] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 4b 00 07 80 00 00 08 00
[ 8146.898890] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 1258293120 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
[ 8148.451568] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
bash-5.0$
Which looks like an issue with /dev/sdb, not /dev/sdb1. Any ideas? Boot record or deeper?
At the moment, I probably have enough hard disk space to backup the backup disk, if you follow me, as I'm passing a 225G disk through my hands.
I also have my son's old 1TB platter, but it's a case of 'It's fine, IF it mounts'. It's a 'maybe' disk. The controller is iffy. So the trick is to put stuff on and get it off in one session 
|
|
|
10-03-2020, 06:13 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS, Manjaro
Posts: 6,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid
This is a 500G 2.5" platter disk which I'm using as a backup disk on /dev/sdb1. So it normally gets block copies or rsync jobs. Now some disk fault turned up and it got treated by e2fsck which did stuff, as it usually does. Then, next day (today) I get this
Code:
[mount /dev/sdb1
[ 8146.891969] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x08
[ 8146.893704] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
[ 8146.895424] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
[ 8146.897148] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 4b 00 07 80 00 00 08 00
[ 8146.898890] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 1258293120 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
[ 8148.451568] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
bash-5.0$
Which looks like an issue with /dev/sdb, not /dev/sdb1. Any ideas? Boot record or deeper?
At the moment, I probably have enough hard disk space to backup the backup disk, if you follow me, as I'm passing a 225G disk through my hands.
I also have my son's old 1TB platter, but it's a case of 'It's fine, IF it mounts'. It's a 'maybe' disk. The controller is iffy. So the trick is to put stuff on and get it off in one session 
|
The device upon which /dev/sdb1 is built is /dev/sdb. It is not the partition /dev/sdb1 specifically that has been reported as having an error, it is a sector of the DEVICE /dev/sdb. This COULD corrupt data on the /dev/sdb1 partition, but could be in another part of the device that is not /dev/sdb1. It COULD, on the other hand, be an isolated I/O error and nothing to worry about. There is not enough information to judge. I would, therefor, submit the disk to additional analysis and see what the disk diagnostic software reports. I might also start to budget for a replacement solution for my backups! (Just in case, because one thing about hardware is that it always fails in the end. Always!)
|
|
|
10-03-2020, 06:13 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,418
Original Poster
|
Sorry, my bad. I/O error. Doesn't repeat.
|
|
|
10-04-2020, 11:38 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,950
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid
This is a 500G 2.5" platter disk whand it got treated by e2fsck which I'm using as a backup disk on /dev/sdb1.
So it normally gets block copies or rsync jobs. Now some disk fault turned up which did stuff, as it usually does. Then, next day (today) I get this....
|
So your backup device regularly fails.
Until you get a reasonably reliable disk there is little point in taking backups.
|
|
|
10-06-2020, 05:35 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,418
Original Poster
|
I figured this. The disk is powers down, and is slow to start. So it throws one read error. I went a bit OTT on the knee-jerk reaction. The disk is fine, and young enough usage-wise.
I was thinking that I could just about backup the backup disk at the moment as I had a spare usb disk lying about. But it's case had some solder bridges on it's little pcb, so that wasn't going to work until I get a new case.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|