I don't think that's going to matter as much, that sounds like it was written for win 9.x memory management and Linux handles things much differently, instead of loading things in use and flushing them when closed, Linux caches everything to RAM... really, I don't think there's going to be a performance hit. Actually, I'm running the same sort of machine, P1 200, 64Mb of PC66 SDRAM, and it runs fine. I did at one time have it with 128, and it ran quicker, mainly because it didn't have to page to swap to run X and a browser... but the thing is headless now.
Cheers,
Finegan
|