LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Hardware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/)
-   -   ATI or NVidia? (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/ati-or-nvidia-194192/)

zmieff 06-16-2004 10:20 AM

ATI or NVidia?
 
I'm looking forward to buy a new graphic card.

So, what would you suggest, an ATI or NVidia-based??

Which of them are more 'compatible' with GNU/Linux; which are easier to install?

slackMeUp 06-16-2004 10:29 AM

It depends.

On the Open Source (good) side. . .
ATi all the way, most of the Radeon chips support 3D acceleration.
The Open Source nVidia drivers only support 2D.

On the closed source (evil) side. . .
ATi has good drivers and are really starting to pick up in their Linux support.
nVidia also has good drivers but I have read about more problems from nVidia's drivers then with the ones from ATi.

FedoraNoob 06-16-2004 11:02 AM

Yep I agree.. I've always had an easier time with ATI.

Even back with the Geforces, I had a few hiccups when probing and sometimes drivers didnt work as promised.

320mb 06-16-2004 11:07 AM

LOL, if you do a forum search........you'll find that ATI drivers have
lots of problems in the 2.6x kernels...........

Go with nVidia.......the drivers may be closed source.....but
at least they work!!

FedoraNoob 06-16-2004 11:19 AM

Ohh.. forgot.. I'm talking about older versions.. nothing that came out the past 1.5- 2 years!!

Guess I shouldnt have said anything!

LavaDevil94 06-16-2004 11:21 AM

Definently nVidia. ATi drivers still arent very good (especially with WineX), but the nVidia ones are perfect.

sirra462 06-16-2004 11:31 AM

Wow, I am surprised by the "go with ATI because it is easier" response. Just do a simple search and you will see that more people have trouble with ATI driver than with Nvidia drivers. At the moment Nvidia is way more linux friendly. That doesn't mean that ATI doesn't work, it will just take longer if there is a problem. They are getting a lot better, that is for sure.
Right now - go with Nvidia - performance seems to be a little better, support seems to be a little better, and there installer is much easier to use.

LoungeLizard 06-16-2004 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by slackMeUp
It depends.

On the Open Source (good) side. . .
ATi all the way, most of the Radeon chips support 3D acceleration.
The Open Source nVidia drivers only support 2D.

I agree go with ATI in my experience it proforms better, and like slackMeUp said supports 3D acceleration

proudclod 06-16-2004 12:25 PM

Yes, but the OSS ATI Driver acceleration is poor.

In a nutshell, buy an nVidia card. And I'm an ATI devotee :)

slackMeUp 06-16-2004 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by proudclod
Yes, but the OSS ATI Driver acceleration is poor.

Hehe.. it's not like the nVidia OSS driver even does 3D anyway.

Like I said:

For the Open Source side of things, ATi is the way to go.

Some people only want to use OSS drivers, because using nVidia's or ATi's binary drivers taints the kernel and your system from being fully open source and free.

If you want to play heavy 3D games, get a console, or worse yet install Windows.

zmieff 06-16-2004 02:49 PM

ok,

thanks for your response.
i think i'll buy a nvidia-card

greets


:cool: :cool:

slackMeUp 06-16-2004 03:04 PM

Good to see that you came to a choice. . .

Have fun with your new card.

Electro 06-16-2004 03:40 PM

Drivers from Nvidia are not closed source. In Nvidia's documentation you can extract the binary file and you will then get source code. Nvidia is better when it comes to OpenGL. When you are running DirectX programs ATI is better. LINUX uses OpenGL to render objects in 3D. LINUX does not use DirectX.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.