LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2013, 12:06 PM   #1
kel_en
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, MX
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 17
Which distribution best for VIA KM400/KN400


I have two machines with the KM400/KN400/A chip sets and both have Athlon K7 processors. One machine is a desktop and one a laptop. I have run Debian successfully, Sarge through Squeeze, for many years in both machines. However, Debian 7, Wheezy, will not work in the laptop. I'm afraid to try the desktop. I spent a lot of effort and gave up, eventually going back to Debian 6, Squeeze. All indications are that Debian has abandoned support for this type of hardware in their default systems. The kernel no longer supports the VIA 82C586A IDE controller and the latest Openchrome driver is a problem. I thought Gentoo would be a good alternative and I developed a great text machine but couldn't get X to work at all, probably the Xorg Openchrome driver problem, so back to Debian Squeeze with an older Openchrome driver. Any suggestions for a new distribution, including the BSDs, that would likely support my hardware in the coming years?
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:39 PM   #2
GlennsPref
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Devuan
Posts: 3,654
Blog Entries: 33

Rep: Reputation: 283Reputation: 283Reputation: 283
Hi,
Quote:
I have two machines with the KM400/KN400/A chip sets and both have Athlon K7 processors
I had two of these running when they were new on Mandriva. They were both desktops with ati/nvidia graphics cards (no on-board graphics)

The main machine was a proxied(to save isp bandwidth costs) firewalled gateway.

One question, have you been able to upgrade the kernel using the installed modules?

This can help making sure and older module is not neglected, I think the command is...

Code:
make localmodconfig
There are bound to be other answers, but I hope this helps you.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:58 PM   #3
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,109
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
Might work out of the box with hand massaged i486 kernels.I am not sure since I don't have your gear.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/anti...files/Testing/

Quote:
At the moment antiX-12 comes as a full distro (c695MB), a base distro (c355MB) and a new core distro (c135MB) all for 486 (PI and K5/K6 AMD) and 686 kernels. For those who wish to have total control over the install, use antiX-core and build up.
This has carried over into AntiX 13.

http://antix.mepis.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
 
Old 06-01-2013, 07:09 PM   #4
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,003
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
Slitaz is specifically aimed towards older machines, as does Frugalware. I've had a little experience with Frugalware, since it's originally based on Arch linux I really like the package management. The installer is sufficient. I had issues with modern hardware with it, however, as it is aimed at older hardware you might have better luck. I've never tried Slitaz but heard good things.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 07:45 PM   #5
kel_en
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, MX
Posts: 125

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Thanks for the replies. I will check antiX, Frugalware and Slitaz. I hope to find a distribution that uses XFree86 and not Xorg since the last time I checked XFree86 still allowed the use of the Via driver instead of the Openchrome driver. I believe a custom kernel will resolve the IDE problem associated with the 2.6.32 and 3.various Debian kernels. I haven't figured out how to build a custom kernel since my /boot partition is not large enough to hold a second kernel and its init files. I'm thinking about that one. The command "make localmodconfig" will be probably be useful since I know what modules I need. Thanks again.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KM400/KN400 display video card xvilamanya Mandriva 0 11-13-2006 12:07 PM
Via KM400 Unichrome anupamsr Linux - Hardware 3 04-21-2006 11:24 AM
Suse 9.2 and Via?S3G KM400/Km400 christo_lc Linux - Newbie 2 05-10-2005 03:29 AM
KM400 driver help request ka9qlq Linux - Hardware 0 10-02-2004 08:23 PM
km400, direct rendering ykcorse Linux - Games 0 03-14-2004 04:30 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration