Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I think all the distros are currently shipping with 2.4 as the kernel and you have to recompile manually if you want the 2.6 kernel. At some point all the distros will be shipping the 2.6 kernel. How do they decide when 2.6 is ready for prime time? Is there some official Linux board of directors who votes on things like this? Does Linus issue a proclamation declaring that the 2.6 kernel is ready? I'm just curious.
Well Linus has already declared that kernel 2.6.3 is ready - but that doesn't mean that distros have to ship it. I take it you are talking about ISO based distros - it's totally up to them what kernel version they ship with, and for a linux user it doesn't really matter cos you're perfectly welcome to pull down any version of the kernel at any time and compile it for yourself.
A lot of other distros don't work in this way - arch, crux, gentoo. You only have to 'install' once and then you just keep the system up to date yourself by compiling new packages and kernels - there's no waiting around for a new kernel to be supported.
Most distros will test the kernel out with their particular product before making it part of one of their latest releases, etc. There is no board of director's for Linux in general, Linux is maintained by one man, Linus and he has the say on the kernel which is what Linux is. All these other distros operate on their own, its their decision to include open source applications and updates, etc.
Heck, two years ago I saw a version that shipped both 2.4.2 and 2.2.4 (with the smp options included for multiple processors) so I can guess 2.4.xx was quite new at the time.
I guess there's still issue of "rigorously tested" ie. the difference between Einstein's theory and Newton's law of motion. The 2.6.xx kernels are still quite new, although so far they have been generally stable, they need to undergo more user experience, etc.
Although I can see them including it as an option soon. But they won't omit 2.4.xx yet....
stehyll include it when they want to, for me i have my entire lapop compiled again the linux 2.4.20 headers, and thats alos the kernel verosn i use, im not gonna change it, when i get a new computer i will include the lastest kernel tho, but im not gonna waste time just to put some enw kernel on when i got one that works fine, so itll take like a month il guess b4 tehy all have suport for it (its hard to kernels to work, must recompile soo amny times to hammer out a few bugs
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.