LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-06-2015, 10:07 PM   #1
Feliks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Location: Big Island ;)
Distribution: Arch, Anything I can get my hands on in a VM (;
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What should the size of my partition(s) be?


Hello everyone! I am planning to triple boot Windows 10, Mac OSX Yosemite, and Arch Linux on my 240gb SSD.

I'm wondering how to set up the partitions so first things first:

1)What is the MINIMUM size a Windows OS partition should be?
I've heard huge sizes and tiny ones. I am not looking for an extreme answer; "you need at least 180GB to run windows!" because that's BS... (If you also know the minimum/required for Linux in general that'd be great; if that's not clear enough use Ubuntu as the example)

I need to know the minimum and recommended *healthy (usable)* size for a Windows Partition because I'm planning to triple boot.

2) If I have 240 GB (225 GiB) and don't want to use beyond 80 space how should I partition it? So that I will have:
i) Windows 10 ii) Mac OSX Yosemite iii) Linux and iv) storage space: Games like Skyrim, maybe a program or two


I know it's up to me but I want some general guidelines. My main problem is figuring out how much space I should set aside for the Windows partition.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks guys!
 
Old 10-06-2015, 10:40 PM   #2
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,307
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136
For the Windows 10 minimum requirements, why not go to the source, then take whatever MS says and triple it.
 
Old 10-06-2015, 11:58 PM   #3
Feliks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Location: Big Island ;)
Distribution: Arch, Anything I can get my hands on in a VM (;
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
For the Windows 10 minimum requirements, why not go to the source, then take whatever MS says and triple it.
Why triple? (that gives me 60, I'm just curious what tripling it implies; someone else suggested I do no less than 80)
 
Old 10-07-2015, 06:38 AM   #4
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Go with MS's recommendation is my advice.
Quote:
Hard disk space:
16 GB for 32-bit OS 20 GB for 64-bit OS
However, looking at the other sysreqs, they do appear 'conservative' (on the RAM anyway) and are what I consider "general guidelines".
IMO, tripling it is a good idea.

60/50/40/what ever you decide on, only experience will teach you what works best.
You can always resize later.
 
Old 10-07-2015, 07:05 AM   #5
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,879
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
I no longer do dual boot because I found that I never went into the alternate OS. Needless to say I've never configured triple boot.

Why not evenly split this drive into 3 chunks and let each OS show you how good or bad it works given 80 Gig of size each?

I would not put data storage on my primary OS drive, I usually put extended data storage on an added drive which would be > 1 TB.
 
Old 10-07-2015, 07:49 AM   #6
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,784

Rep: Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304
do you have any other drive (for example storing your home/data/whatever)?
 
Old 10-07-2015, 12:29 PM   #7
Feliks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Location: Big Island ;)
Distribution: Arch, Anything I can get my hands on in a VM (;
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yes I have a 3TB HDD for the rest/majority of my storage but want to put os's on the SSD.


How easy is it to resize partitions? will it break my set up?

(Because if its easy and safe I cn make big partitions and shrink them later)
 
Old 10-07-2015, 01:26 PM   #8
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,879
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feliks View Post
How easy is it to resize partitions? will it break my set up?

(Because if its easy and safe I cn make big partitions and shrink them later)
Grow, very easy. Shrink, not so easy. I recommend starting small and growing as needed versus the other way around.

And I'm not talking about the actions. The actions are not so difficult either way, but to shrink the utilities need to ensure that existing data is retained and this involves moving and consolidating data. There are some risks such as if the system is doing these actions and power is lost during that time. A recommendation is that the system have a battery back-up. To grow a partition it is just simpler in that the partition size is altered.

Last edited by rtmistler; 10-07-2015 at 01:29 PM.
 
Old 10-07-2015, 01:33 PM   #9
maples
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Jessie
Posts: 814

Rep: Reputation: 265Reputation: 265Reputation: 265
Keep in mind that if MS says that you need 16 GB, then that will likely leave you with almost no free space left for other programs.
 
Old 10-07-2015, 07:38 PM   #10
Moose-Dad
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2015
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux /root partition can be 25g. Or less, if you are running a leaner linux. Linux /home partition should be as big as the storage space you intend to use. If you aren't going to store big data (photos, videos, etc), then a /home partition could be 10, 20, or 30gb. But as you likely know, storage space gets eaten up pretty quickly by various media files these days. If you are putting linux on an SSD, you should read some of the tutorials available on the net.
 
Old 10-07-2015, 08:11 PM   #11
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,307
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136Reputation: 6136
Quote:
Why triple?
Because, if you plan on using the MS side of the computer and start installing applications, you will very quickly exceed the "minimum" requirement. On my Windows 7 C:\ drive, I have move than 148 GB used.

Last edited by frankbell; 10-07-2015 at 08:22 PM. Reason: clarity
 
Old 10-07-2015, 08:13 PM   #12
maples
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Jessie
Posts: 814

Rep: Reputation: 265Reputation: 265Reputation: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Because, if you plan on using the MS side of the computer and start installing applications, you will very quickly exceed the "minimum" requirement. On my Windows 7 C:/ drive, I have far move than 148 GB used.
I have mine at 50G, but it's a very tight fit.
 
Old 10-08-2015, 01:00 AM   #13
chrism01
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Rocky 9.2
Posts: 18,349

Rep: Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750Reputation: 2750
Historically MS have always specified the absolute bare minimum for the install (of just the OS & eg Office) and basic running (usually that equates to 'walking').
Probably a marketing trick to ensure that you buy it... once you have, you're likely to keep it and if necessary, up your HW to match.
 
Old 10-08-2015, 01:34 AM   #14
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,784

Rep: Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304Reputation: 7304
resizing is easy, but only if you have enough space for that. In your case (3 OSs on the same drive) probably you will not be so simple.
240 GB SSD is more than enough for the 3 OSs if you can use your additional drive for your data, home dir and common files.
Partitioning also depends on the softwares you want to use, for example if you want to install a lot of MS tools you will need more space.
In general I would use 100 GB for MS and 70/70 for the others. You can also try to keep some free space to be able to modify/resize partitions later.
 
Old 10-08-2015, 02:53 AM   #15
Feliks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Location: Big Island ;)
Distribution: Arch, Anything I can get my hands on in a VM (;
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64 View Post
resizing is easy, but only if you have enough space for that. In your case (3 OSs on the same drive) probably you will not be so simple.
240 GB SSD is more than enough for the 3 OSs if you can use your additional drive for your data, home dir and common files.
Partitioning also depends on the softwares you want to use, for example if you want to install a lot of MS tools you will need more space.
In general I would use 100 GB for MS and 70/70 for the others. You can also try to keep some free space to be able to modify/resize partitions later.
I shouldn't leave any space unpartitioned right? I can leave free space but it should still be in a partition correct?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
partition size detected by testdisk bigger than disk size Person_1873 Linux - Hardware 2 03-17-2011 11:11 PM
Solaris 8 - file size and partition size discrepancy noir911 Solaris / OpenSolaris 1 02-10-2009 04:43 PM
file system size larger than fysical size:superblock or partition table corrupt klizon Linux - General 0 06-18-2004 04:18 PM
Total partition size - User partition size is not equals to Free partition size navaneethanj Linux - General 5 06-14-2004 12:55 PM
fdisk partition size differs from mounted partition size jimieee Linux - General 3 10-15-2003 03:10 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration