What is the package management tool of your choice
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
View Poll Results: What is the package management tool you find the most convinient (and why)?
Pacman, because it is simply the best. It is fast, good dependency handling. It is easy to create your own packages. And if the packager has added a dependeny you don't need, it is very easy to cheat Pacman to think it is installed (by creating an empty package that "provides" that package). It doesn't overwrite files (unless you use -f to force it). In short, Pacman behaves just like a civilized package manager.
Portage is by far endlessly superior IMO. it has USE-flags, ACCEPT_LICENSE, brilliant dependency handling, it's easy to write packages -- and as an added bonus everything is compiled on your computer, ensuring trust, security and freedom. it also of course helps performance.
on systems without Portage I ended up using wget and make, because that was the only way I can achieve an even remotely behaving system, besides installing Gentoo Prefix. the current solution is to just use Gentoo on all computers. :-)
Last edited by indietrash; 03-01-2013 at 02:34 AM.
I just use Slackware's CLI commands: installpkg, upgradepkg, removepkg and even makepkg. There is also src2pkg. But none of those options are given.
Also, I prefer using CLI commands installpkg or upgradepkg --install-new, removepkg... but only offered pkgtool. I use ./configure, make, make install or sh package_name.SlackBuild and then installpkg or upgradepkg --install-new name_package.txz
Actually, pgtool rarely used, only when I can not uninstall a package with removepkg.
And src2pkg is excellent tool for converting packages.