Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Punctuated Equilibrium? I barely ran into that doing evolutionary anthropology. Then again, my lecturers were of the phyletic gradualism school, maybe if they were into punctuated equilibrium we would have heard more about it.
I've been referring to Richard Goldschmidt, he of 'hopeful monsters' and he (although an evolutionist) blows them both out of the water.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
I'll take the boring pintless and stupid warning, I'll take it under advisment. Voltaire is a satirical polemicist, so I can se where an overview of one of his plays could sound pretty awful. If its as bad as advertised, I'll drop it and read something else. Thats if I can find a copy of Candide in the library, I dont like reading non-technical documents from a scree. n
Candide was so bad they all thought they could do better, I gather. There was a French play 'Le Misanthrope' and bits of that were genuinely funny.
Thats true, every project has somebodys head on the chopping block (that is the image I get after Voltaire has been discussed LOL). With 'desktop' computers it seems that sometimes the blowtorch is aimed at the motherboard (etc.) of the user! Its worst when the company is under pressure- intel is particularly bad there, with a litany of overheating and unreliable CPUs, but almost everyone in x86 CPUs or GPUs has done it- Intel, AMD, Cyrix, 3DFX, nVidia, ATI......
Yet some of those cpus/gpus just needed installation by a careful techie. . . but they had been fired :-/. This one is gone back to school.
Last edited by business_kid; 05-28-2011 at 03:32 AM.
I've been referring to Richard Goldschmidt, he of 'hopeful monsters' and he (although an evolutionist) blows them both out of the water.
I really should look into Goldschmidt some more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid
Yet some of those cpus/gpus just needed installation by a careful techie. . . but they had been fired :-/. This one is gone back to school.
LOL, sometimes IF the techie knew about problems they were avoidable (getting bigger/better heatsinks, making sure that the case had good airflow, etc.). Not in all cases though....I still laugh about the initial 'Intel Pentium 3 1.13GHz' release.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.