LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2004, 01:57 PM   #1
Nightfrost
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30
Thumbs up What's the deal with the framebuffer?


Hi all,

I recently started playing around a little with the framebuffer support in linux. Actually, it all started with me trying to get bootsplash working on a newly installed debian system. While I was at a newly installed system I decided to try apt-build, and because of that and other reasons I ended up using console for quite some time, without installing xfree. While looking around for a nice console webbrowser, I came across links2 which uses the framebuffer and gives a rather nice web-browsing environment with pictures and java. Looking around a bit more, I found a fbtv for watching TV and fbi for viewing images, and I've heard mplayer has fb-support as well.

That's when it occured to me that in this way one could probably have a pretty nice (and extremely fast, I take it) system with pretty nice features. Now, my questions are: is there anyone out there relying only on a framebuffer-console without X? Are there any console/fb-apps to be recommended in replacement of X-apps? Is there any distro exploiting this idea? Is there any way to get 3D-acceleration working without X (I doubt this)?

Also; what's the deal with the framebuffer? I can't really formulate this question better cause I have no clue as of what framebuffer really is. Why is X-windows necessary at all? Is it possible to have a "frambuffer-window manager"?

Thanks.
 
Old 11-30-2004, 01:09 PM   #2
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
I guess in newbie terms, framebuffer is used to view graphical contents on a CLI (Command Line Interface) without an X Server, etc. I'm sure it would be possible to have a framebuffer Window Manager but what would tbe the point when you need the X Server to run it... I wouldn't see any difference.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VESA framebuffer vs Intel framebuffer in Slackware 10.0 with default kernel brancalessio Slackware 3 01-20-2005 03:21 PM
have i got a fair deal? marsques General 26 09-26-2004 04:35 AM
What's the deal? vagabondmuse Fedora 5 12-30-2003 08:45 PM
xscreensaver ..... what's the deal ? :( purpleburple Linux - General 1 07-10-2002 04:15 PM
Okay, here's the deal. . . musicnut01 Linux - Networking 5 06-29-2001 06:01 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration