Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Read this page at www.tuxradar.com, it'll provide an answer to a lot of your questions. The Security sections explains in easy terms what you're asking about viruses.
Google is your friend for this type of question and will result in more goodwill from your fellow Linux users. The link I got, which is reputable and #1 on Google search from the query "defragmentation linux", is appropriate to your question.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,511
Rep:
The Linux background is Unix, a secure multi user system.
Lots of normal file systems available, file systems with
almost no fragmentation. Linux can run on anything.
The most of the internet ( and Google ) runs on Linux.
Super computers use Linux.
And Linux has excellent memory management.
The windows background is a more primitive OS, single user.
Originally meant for 16 bit 8088 ? Later: Intel 386.
The file systems still do fragmentation, thus they need
periodically de-fragmentation done.
And windows still has poor memory management. It cannot
take advantage of all RAM "all the time", like Linux can.
They could have improved both issues. They didn't .....
( Rumors a year ago said no defrag, windows 7 ? )
..
And windows still has poor memory management. It cannot
take advantage of all RAM "all the time", like Linux can.
I think the specific difference in ram use you are referring to does not actually exist.
Windows lies about memory statistics.
As you probably know, Linux memory reporting tools give correct simple values for memory statistics even though the underlying reality is too complex to be represented by those simple values. The result is many users know they are confused and/or think something is broken.
Windows memory reporting tools intentionally give incorrect simple values to prevent the user from realizing that he can't actually get a meaningful measure of memory use and to stop users from thinking something is broken.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.