Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
12-18-2002, 06:07 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64; FreeBSD; OS X
Posts: 3,762
Rep:
|
Quote:
By default it appears Redhat 7.x has ipchains, and Redhat 8 does away with chains, and gives you tables
|
Actually, RH8 had both installed and running??!?!? by default.
|
|
|
12-19-2002, 09:17 AM
|
#17
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 327
Rep:
|
Installed perhaps... Running no.
It's simply not possible - the kernel hooks required will conflict with one another. Which is why you get the nasty error messages about your kernel needing upgrading if you try to run iptables while you have ipchains up - iptables is trying to hook up, and being denied because ipchains already has a hook there - so it thinks your kernel isn't capable.
Slick.
|
|
|
12-19-2002, 10:06 AM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64; FreeBSD; OS X
Posts: 3,762
Rep:
|
Be that as it may, both iptables and ipchains were selected to begin at boot time as services. This is what lead to my confusion as to whether ipchains was needed, and why I posted my question in the security forum. If ipchains was not running, then why start at boot time?
|
|
|
12-23-2002, 04:54 AM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: /mnt/UNV/Mlkway/Earth/USA/California/Silicon Valley
Distribution: Kubuntu, Debian Buster Stable, Windoze 7
Posts: 684
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, I got it all now:
Ipchains is deactivated (even deinstalled), iptables is running and the ruleset was setup by a tool called FIRESTARTER, which I can recommend warmly to anybody that wants to setup a customized firewall.
It even has a frontend where it shows hits that the firewall takes.
Great tool and iptables just makes a better impression in functionality than ipchains.
Thanks for helping me get there... ;-)
Markus
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|