Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
the display adapter is built in to the CPU how come I have 2 display adapters
even /proc/cpuinfo shows processor 0 and 1 both running at different speeds
the specs all of them I have found say single CPU so who's right
the kernel or the spects
it's a HP mini 210-1040NR
My experience with a very similar processor showed that hyperthreading just slowed things down, even when running a single high-CPU process on a single thread. With HT enabled, it would use ~140% CPU (out of 200%) according to top and would regularly fall behind real time and miss data. With HT disabled, it would use ~80% CPU (out of 100%) and would never miss a beat. Depending on what you do with the machine you might consider disabling it, but you should test to see how your workload compares with and without first.
Last edited by suicidaleggroll; 04-20-2016 at 04:18 PM.
My experience with a very similar processor showed that hyperthreading just slowed things down, even when running a single high-CPU process on a single thread. With HT enabled, it would use ~140% CPU (out of 200%) according to top and would regularly fall behind real time and miss data. With HT disabled, it would use ~80% CPU (out of 100%) and would never miss a beat. Depending on what you do with the machine you might consider disabling it, but you should test to see how your workload compares with and without first.
so how would I go about disabling it ?
I have some bugs with KDE when doing a lot of disk top switching and switching from X to a VT and back that it may be causing
You would disable it in the machine's BIOS menu. Hit F10 or whatever it is on boot and you should find it buried in the menu system.
don't have that option in the BIOS
found this on line
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu1/online
BUT the path is wrong it should be
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
added it to /etc/rc.d/rc.local
every thing about this computer seems faster even loading web pages
I'm going to build another kernel anyway I always do to speed up booting
maybe a better option would be to turn it off in the kernel build
by not building SMP in to the kernel haven't found hyper threading in menuconfig
I'd just leave the HT enabled and leave SMP on. That system is so slow to being with, I doubt you'll gain anything from all that work. I guess it would be worth a test.
A number of years ago HT was really bad. Software now has caught up with it if you are running a modern distro.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.