Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
06-25-2002, 02:46 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 48
Rep:
|
Surfing without KDE etc.
I wanna setup a bare bones linux box that JUST lets you surf the net.
Not inside some OS GUI like KDE or something, just bare bones surfing.
A Kernel, a root image, and a graphical surfing interface.
Can anyone help?
Does a linux web browser like this exist?
Thanks.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 02:54 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Distribution: K/Ubuntu 18.04-14.04, Scientific Linux 6.3-6.4, Android-x86, Pretty much all distros at one point...
Posts: 1,802
Rep: 
|
Theroretically, you could set up a box that launches X with Mozilla as the window manager,... but I have no idea how to accomplish something like that.
You could set it up to auto-boot to the user that the X-server runs in, and it would just autolaunch Mozilla. I don't know how you would prevent a user from closing the Mozilla session and preventing them from trying to gain access to the machine through switching virtual terminals. Perhaps a script which sould auto-launch Mozilla and cause it to re-spawn once down.
Alternatively, you could have Nautilus run in a Gnome session where there are no icons but nautilus on the desktop and the menu bar didn't run...
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 04:27 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 48
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Mmmmm...
You telling me there's no such thing as a Linux web browser that doesn't need a GUI like KDE or similar.
I find that hard to believe, but anyway...
If i'm forced to use a GUI, what's the smallest GUI out there.
Just enough to get the browser running.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:15 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,316
Rep:
|
No what he said is that you at least need X to run a webbrowser. KDE or gnome are a complete desktop environment that come with their own window manager. A window manager is what creates the border around a window and makes the extra minimize and close buttons. You won't need that since you just want to run one application. So instead of starting up a window manager just let it start up your webbrowser. Shouldn't be to hard to run through your startup scripts and modify them to only start the application instead of a window manager.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:20 AM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
ok, what you do is get "zen" which is a frame buffer based web browser, so you get pictures and such but without running X. of course if you just want to get rid of kde just use a different window manager...
also gnome2 introduces gtk-fb which means that a number of gnome applications can be run inside a framebuffer again, and not with X
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:33 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Somebody correct me if i am wrong but you sound like a customer for lynx.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:46 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 48
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
No what he said is that you at least need X to run a webbrowser.
|
I understand this.
I found something here... http://www.chuvakin.org/kiodoc/
It's on the right track of what i'm looking for, but it's waaaaaay too big. And, it still needs an X.
I'm busy downloading ZEN... it looks like what I'm looking for.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:12 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: Finland
Distribution: Mandrake 9.0
Posts: 188
Rep:
|
yes, go with lynx. It's (if not very beautiful) ultimately fast and stable.
Otherwise go with BlackBox/Mozilla combo.
|
|
|
06-25-2002, 06:24 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: India
Distribution: Suse , Mandrake
Posts: 121
Rep:
|
So you do not want to run X server and just browse the web. You can use "links" ( not lynx) this is very small (smaller than lynx) and lightweight text browser. I can display frames and tables ( just like graphic browsers do).
I use KDE and I still use links often, because it's very fast and renders the html pages pretty well.
|
|
|
06-26-2002, 02:31 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 48
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks everyone.
I have some last questions...
What's the smallest (approximately) I can get an X with a web browser? With kernel and all.
I saw a site that says 200Mb is good. I just wanna know how much smaller I can go.
If I want Java support, would that be a big difference in size?
Do the text browsers support Java? Does Zen?
|
|
|
06-26-2002, 08:59 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: The next brick house on the right.
Distribution: Kubuntu 18.04, Bodhi 5.0
Posts: 691
Rep:
|
Apparently you have hardware issues either with RAM or disk space. So how small do you need to be? Or is this just an exercise in "how small can I make it"?
Just curious  .
|
|
|
06-26-2002, 09:59 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 48
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Apparently you have hardware issues either with RAM or disk space. So how small do you need to be? Or is this just an exercise in "how small can I make it"?
|
Mmmmm... Size does matter?
I don't really have any hardware issues. I am going to setup a box like this, so I guess I wanna know what's in the bank before I spend it. Then I'll know if I've done a good job or not.
What I needed to know to start off, I kinda know now.
If you want to surf the web from in raw linux (no X) then you're gonna have to be happy doing so in text mode...
OR, you could use ZEN, and have limited graphics support.
As soon as you want more, like JAVA scripting, then it's best you use one of the browsers that run in X.
I want as much as possible in as little as possible space.
I'll figure out how to make it all work, strictly as a browser, but I really want to see how small I can make it.
|
|
|
06-26-2002, 04:26 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: redhat suse mandrake freebsd
Posts: 344
Rep:
|
I know that its not really on topic, but to give you
an idea how small it could get, i surfed the internet
only booting from a single floppy.
It contains a Gui and a browser and more, but...
its not linux though
Its a demo from QNX an embedded unixlike
system. They even got opera ported for it.
Maybe there is an embedded linux out there
that can do the same ?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|