LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - General (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/)
-   -   Slackware versus Archlinux (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/slackware-versus-archlinux-808790/)

GazL 05-23-2010 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by posixculprit (Post 3974135)
It does if you're not planning on performing full installs and would like just the "base system" (AAA or somesuch? haven't used Slackware in a while) + programs you directly use and their dependencies.

Yes. That's a fair point. As much as I like Slackware, if someone wants a minimal install, I'd be inclined to point towards Arch or debian. It can be done on Slackware with some care, but the 'full' install is really the recommended way to run Slackware.

naikon89 05-23-2010 06:29 PM

Slackware. The rolling release nature of Arch is too buggy and unstable. You could run Slackware as a production distro, Arch, I don't think so.

Aquarius_Girl 06-06-2010 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EricTRA (Post 3976199)
Hello Anisha,

From my personal point of view, every relevant thing you can put on a resume can improve the impression it has on future employers. However listing experiences with distinct distros in my opinion doesn't add any value. Companies are more looking to specific knowledge when reviewing a resume, for example high availability, reduncancy, distributed storage and things like that appeal nowadays a lot more then a list of distros you have experience with and which will hardly be used by the larger companies (most of them use RedHat, Debian, OpenSUSE, the big boys).

What would give you an advantage mentioning LFS, Arch, Slackware, is if you are referring to it to indicate troubleshooting skills in my opinion.

Thanks for the enlightenment, Eric :hattip:

Aquarius_Girl 06-06-2010 11:28 PM

chilebiker, brucehinrichs, naikon89

Thanks to all of you for giving informative replies :)

brianL 06-07-2010 05:12 AM

Which have you chosen?

Aquarius_Girl 06-07-2010 05:16 AM

I have chosen Slackware but still i am worried about the version i am having i.e. 12.2

I don't know whether it is very stable or not ?
I don't want to get in some mess at the very starting point !

brianL 06-07-2010 05:24 AM

Yes, it's stable. It's still maintained with security patches.

Aquarius_Girl 06-07-2010 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EricTRA (Post 3976199)
Companies are more looking to specific knowledge when reviewing a resume, for example high availability, redundancy, distributed storage and things like that appeal nowadays a lot more then a list of distros you have experience with and which will hardly be used by the larger companies (most of them use RedHat, Debian, OpenSUSE, the big boys).

Eric,

Kindly explain in more detail the terms "high availability and redundancy" In what context you are talking ?

I think i have guessed wrong that's why i am asking !

linus72 06-07-2010 05:32 AM

12.2 rocks bro

just make sure you have SLackBuilds setup and src2pkg
what desktop?
xfce?

Aquarius_Girl 06-07-2010 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 3995183)
Yes, it's stable. It's still maintained with security patches.

Thanks,

Off-topic:
When we say "It's still maintained with security patches.", is this related to viruses/hackers or unstable softwares ?

brianL 06-07-2010 05:33 AM

Ah, just remembered that you don't have internet access at home, so getting all the security patches for 12.2 may be tricky. What you could do is look out for Linux magazines giving away Slackware 13.1 on their DVDs, then you would be up to date from the start.

Aquarius_Girl 06-07-2010 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by linus72 (Post 3995187)
12.2 rocks bro

just make sure you have SLackBuilds setup and src2pkg
what desktop?
xfce?

Thanks for replying,
I'll have to study about SLackBuilds setup and src2pkg before commenting on them !

I'll be using LXDE desktop :)

Aquarius_Girl 06-07-2010 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 3995191)
Ah, just remembered that you don't have internet access at home, so getting all the security patches for 12.2 may be tricky. What you could do is look out for Linux magazines giving away Slackware 13.1 on their DVDs, then you would be up to date from the start.

Thanks again,

The only Linux magazine i can find in India is "Linux For You".

and since 13.1 is released in June I'll checkout the July edition of the magazine !

EricTRA 06-07-2010 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anishakaul (Post 3995184)
Eric,

Kindly explain in more detail the terms "high availability and redundancy" In what context you are talking ?

I think i have guessed wrong that's why i am asking !

Hello Anisha,

When I referred to High Availability I was referring to the structure one can set up in order to provide a better availability when offering services, like a webserver. If you have one server that serves your customers and that server fails for some reason, then your service is failing. If you set up two of the same servers, having the same software installed, and you install some High Availability platform on them, then if one server fails, the other one will still be offering the webservice.

Redundancy can come in a variety of things, be it in hardware (power supplies, harddisks, network cards) and/or their setup (RAID, Virtual IP) just to name a few examples.

Distributed storage means that you can combine various servers into one large(r) storage. A client system could then connect to the large storage and will see it as if it was a local filesystem.

I hope that clears up some things.

Kind regards,

Eric

Aquarius_Girl 06-09-2010 01:00 AM

Thanks for the detailed explanation, Eric :)

EricTRA 06-09-2010 02:17 AM

Hi Anisha,

You're welcome. Hope you get it working like you want to.

Kind regards,

Eric

Aquarius_Girl 08-12-2010 04:06 AM

May be a dumb question
 
I was just going through this thread once again so :
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricTRA (Post 3973997)
When using Slackware, you'll know what you need up front since you're the one who has to take care of the dependencies, hence you'll download and install the dependencies before the package itself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrecortel (Post 3973860)
it has package manager,though it wont check dependencies for you.

According to the above two quotes, Slack does have a package manager, but still we are required to take care of the dependencies ourselves, then what is that package manager supposed to do ? I mean what is the use of that package manager then ?

GazL 08-12-2010 04:28 AM

Slackware's package management provides:
  • installpkg - Install a package and keeping track of what files get installed.
  • upgradepkg - Replace a package (add/replace existing files with files from a different version of the package, remove existing files no longer required)
  • removepkg - Remove all the files belonging to a package.

It's a simple tool for people who like to keep things simple. No dependency checking. No automated fetching of packages from elsewhere - just installing, removing and replacing of the packages that you tell it to.

brianL 08-12-2010 04:29 AM

If you're installing something from slackbuilds.org, on each download page, there's a README file, which will tell you about required and/or optional dependencies. If you get sbopkg, the whole process can be speeded up by using queuefiles.

Aquarius_Girl 08-12-2010 04:34 AM

Thank you Gazl for the clear explanation.

Thanks briany, though I don't know what is the use of sbopkg but I'll checkout soon.

brianL 08-12-2010 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anishakaul (Post 4063881)
though I don't know what is the use of sbopkg but I'll checkout soon.

It more or less automates the processing of SlackBuilds using a ncurses GUI, instead of the "manual" way (see the HOWTO page on the SlackBuilds site).

Aquarius_Girl 08-12-2010 04:40 AM

Alright, thanks for the explanation, but I think it is better to prefer the manual way to understand what is going on !


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.