My advice: Try them both and see which suits you best.
Everyone's tastes are different and sometimes even the subtlest of aspects may put you off a distro. For me it was that Arch don't have a crypto-signing mechanism for their packages. |
I have used both and I like both very well. I do like pacman and have chosen to stick with Arch over the last several months anyway, but I still boot up Slackware every once in a while. If you do not have an internet connection, I'd go with Slackware. It's a great OS and it's very stable. You can always download packages from slackbuilds.org and save them to USB to install on your machine later. Just my 2 cents :)
|
Thanks Gazl,
I knew some one would say so, but both these distros require huge amount of time to set up. That's why i preferred to know which one should i prefer to start with. And i do want to start LFS soon, will my choice of arch or slack effect it ? |
Quote:
|
Everything's included. All you have to do is run, as root:
Code:
installpkg vlc-1.0.6-i486-1alien.tgz |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can't do such things in Arch ? |
Ok it means learning Linux will be same irrespective of whether i install arch or slack ??
|
I've never tried Arch (yet), but it is a rolling release, which means more dependent on a constant internet connection. Try dual-booting both of them, eh?
|
Offtopic:
I am not a native english speaker: Do words like "huh" and "eh" denote scarsism ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Huh? and Eh? = Don't you think so? (more or less). Or: Eh? = I can't believe you just said that. Depends on context. |
Quote:
Actually, Slack doesn't take as much effort as you might think. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM. |