Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Selinux is causing all sorts of problems on my system.
This all just started accruing today. For instance now when the system goes down I see a million audits flying across the screen. Another thing SE seems to be doing is killing initd during the boot process making it re spawn its self about 6 times before it can finally boot. Any suggestions ?
Ill just leave it disabled. I was just wondering if there is an actual fix to the problem though.
In post #14 in the thread link here, I show how to fix it. Fedora is destined to have quirks because there is no money involved, Red Hat puts focus on Red Hat Enterprise Limited because there is money involved. If Fedora was stable, would you bother giving them the money for the Enterprise edition? or would you go with the free edition?.
I am sure its a labeling problem. Looking at the logs every thing that it is preventing has the _t label, but I have already tried to relabel the system and that didn't do any good
I am sure its a labeling problem. Looking at the logs everything that it is preventing has the _t label, but I have already tried to relabel the system and that didn't do any good
And how *exactly* did you do the relabelling? Please post the actual commands.
Quote:
In post #14 in the thread link here, I show how to fix it.
No you don't. You removed the distro. You are entitled to your own opinion and you may carry a grudge against Fedora (apparently due to lack of knowledge) but please refrain from posting that kind of "humoristic" "answers" when people look for answers.
Quote:
Fedora is destined to have quirks because there is no money involved, Red Hat puts focus on Red Hat Enterprise Limited because there is money involved. If Fedora was stable, would you bother giving them the money for the Enterprise edition? or would you go with the free edition?.
Those are uncut B.S. arguments. *Any* GNU/Linux distro has "quirks", money involved or not. RH doesn't want you to move over to RHEL. Those who want or need RHEL for business reasons know that already.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.