Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
sound like the Terminal service using rdp (remote Desktop Protocol) basically a thin client similar to Citrix etc.. yeah it will run on an older slower system, but just remember on the server side you need a Very beefy server machine to take care of a lot of clients..
you still need a secure OS on which to run the terminal services client.. (Linux with rdesktop perhaps ? )
I too would really look hard at putting linux on pc's, business or at home.
All I can say is a friend of mine was at his job one day, and was talking to his IT guys as they were fixing his floors internet/lan they had issues. Anyway, he was chatting with them, and he told them how I got him into slackware recently and how he loved it. Then one of the "IT guys" said "I know a guy who uses linux, but its' not really a good alternative becuase the code is so freely available on the internet."
When what he should have said is, "I'm lazy and I got my degree from a cracker jack box and I live in my mother's basement. And becuase I'm lazy I never looked into linux, although it's computer related, my ignorance over-whelmeth me."
The sad thing is there are probably so many IT guys just like this in the real world. Un-willing to look into alternatives, cost savings out of pure laziness. And the fact that they just tell they're boss, "hey MS has a new thing for our old pc's" and they feel safe. Why rock the cradle type of mind set. Give the boss what he wants, no big equipment purchase and a supposed "safe" option by the market share leader.
But as we all know, feeling safe does not mean you are safe. Leave it to MS to find a way to basically make a windows 98 second edition updates volume 5 and bill it out at the price of a whole new OS.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.