Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
View Poll Results: Which do you like better .deb or .rpm
|
I prefer Debs
|
  
|
5 |
50.00% |
I prefer RPMs
|
  
|
5 |
50.00% |
 |
10-18-2005, 08:09 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
Red Hat Installer, vs Debian Installer
I was wondering if it was possible to use .deb packages in anaconda? Any input? What I would like to do is to use .deb packages with a graphical installer. And finally which packager is better? Thanks 
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 04:27 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
I think anaconda has already been ported to Progeny Debian (and other non rpm based distros e.g. VidaLinux). As for preference, I prefer rpms but like apt very much. I am not well versed about the technical difference between the two, so I won't comment on that.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 05:20 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,755
Rep:
|
RPM isn't only used on RedHat, it's also used in most Linux distros and some non-Linux OS's, and is part of the Linux Standard Base (LSB). DEB is used on Debian-based distros, like Debian, Ubuntu, MEPIS, Knoppix, etc. What you use depends mainly on your distro. I think it's a bad idea to have use both systems together on a system. There is a program called "alien" that can convert between .deb and .rpm packages.
They both have advantages and disadvantages. (Talking about this might lead to a flame war though.) DEB has been around longer, but I think RPM is more widely used. I think both formats maintain a database of all the packages, their dependencies, and their files so that packages can be easily removed, updated, or queried.
For .deb files, the basic program that install them is "dpkg" and advanced package management (using repositories, resolving dependencies) is done with the Apt programs (apt-get, etc.) or its GUIs (Aptitude, Synaptic). For RPMs, the basic program is "rpm" and there are many advanced package management programs, like: Yum / Yumex, Urpmi / RpmDrake (Mandriva), Yast (Suse), Smartpm, Apt4rpm / Synaptic, and others.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 06:37 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep:
|
See why I want to know is because i'm going to create a distro (my previous post), and I was wondering if i could get anaconda to install .deb's instead of RPM's? any thoughts.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 08:04 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by spooon
RPM isn't only used on RedHat, it's also used in most Linux distros and some non-Linux OS's, and is part of the Linux Standard Base (LSB). DEB is used on Debian-based distros, like Debian, Ubuntu, MEPIS, Knoppix, etc. What you use depends mainly on your distro. I think it's a bad idea to have use both systems together on a system. There is a program called "alien" that can convert between .deb and .rpm packages.
They both have advantages and disadvantages. (Talking about this might lead to a flame war though.) DEB has been around longer, but I think RPM is more widely used. I think both formats maintain a database of all the packages, their dependencies, and their files so that packages can be easily removed, updated, or queried.
For .deb files, the basic program that install them is "dpkg" and advanced package management (using repositories, resolving dependencies) is done with the Apt programs (apt-get, etc.) or its GUIs (Aptitude, Synaptic). For RPMs, the basic program is "rpm" and there are many advanced package management programs, like: Yum / Yumex, Urpmi / RpmDrake (Mandriva), Yast (Suse), Smartpm, Apt4rpm / Synaptic, and others.
|
Deb hasn't been around longer than rpm. Redhat introduced RPM in 1995 (previously they used something called RPP), debs were introduced a bit later than that and apt around 1998.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 11:28 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,765
Rep:
|
http://openskills.info/infobox.php?ID=1094
according to that RH has been around since 1994 (mothers day to be specific)
http://telemetrybox.org/tokyo/
and that states that debian has been around since 1995.
so the RH distro has been around longer, but when you look deeper Debian has been around since 1993
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/pr...-intro.en.html
reading this indicates that the .deb has been around since debian started in one form or an other.
i personally like apt-get vs yum as it is faster in resolving dependencies and just works. yes yum works but as stated it is much slower, but both do their job very well.
as for dpkg and rpm both are very easy to work with, but can lead to dependency hell more so in rpm then dpkg as most things that can be installed in debian can be installed via apt-get so you do not have to worry as much about dependency hell like you do with rpm based distros. for that reason alone i like debian based over rpm based better.
as for what installer i like better? well now that i know enough about linux to work with it i like the CLI better as it is faster and cleaner, but for a newbie i LOVED the RH installer. extremely simple to figure out and if you can install windows you can install linux with the RH GUI installer. to me that was a god send at getting my hands clean with linux.
if you could make a .deb distro with the GUI installer from the RPM based distros that would be very sweet for helping newbies convert into linux onto the not so newbie friendly distros that are .deb based.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 01:23 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Debian was started in 1993 but the packaging system was not debs, debs were introduced sometime later. Redhat was started in 94 but didn't use rpm until sometime in 1995. I read this somewhere recently and will post the link when I find it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|