Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
08-28-2004, 06:08 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
performance on an OLD system
I recently installed Mandrake linux 9.1 on my really old system, it has an 100mhz pentium processor and 40 megs of ram.
I wasn't planning on using any graphical interface, so I din't install any.
The system performance is a lot slower than I expected, even using text based applications such as linuxconf takes minutes to load. I expected it to be slow, but nothing like this.
Is there any way to improve performance on this system?
|
|
|
08-28-2004, 06:14 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
One reason could be that a flock of processes is
eating up all RAM and the thing is swapping away...
To get details use:
free
Another reason could be that DMA is not enabled...
To get details use:
hdparm /dev/hd<x>
where x is the letter that corresponds to you actual hdd
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
08-28-2004, 09:37 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,553
Rep:
|
you will have to completely weed out everything that is starting at boot that is not totally esential
then the first task is to rebuild the kernel to support only the hardware you have and absolutely nothing else
and also optimize for your pentium pro ( --march=pentium) by hacking the compiler flags in the kernel Makefile......
I used to use a 90hz pentium like that -- i did put more ram in it but was eventually able to run a gui like blackox or fvwm ok by building linux from scratch......
the think that never got better was the time it took to compile programs ......... long time .......
sometimes days.
those computers cost like 4,000 dollars when they were new 
Last edited by foo_bar_foo; 08-28-2004 at 09:38 PM.
|
|
|
08-28-2004, 10:10 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
A pentium 120 was my main box until year 2000 somewhere, and I ran a fairly recent KDE on it at the time... a 100 should be very quick without a gui, so you must be running a bunch of background processes or something...
|
|
|
08-28-2004, 10:44 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: PCLINUXOS
Posts: 2,918
Rep: 
|
Quote:
The system performance is a lot slower than I expected, even using text based applications such as linuxconf takes minutes to load. I expected it to be slow, but nothing like this.
|
I found the same thing with a Suse 9.1 install to a Pentium 100 with 80MB RAM.
Debian Woody had been running much better on it.
I would suggest trying Debian or Slack.
|
|
|
08-28-2004, 11:42 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Distribution: RHEL, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 1,418
Rep:
|
If you're going for a CLI only install, I'd really suggest Slackware.
If you're not installing a GUI, I really can't see a reason to use a distribution geared towards desktop or gui-tool use, such as SuSE, RedHat (and variants), or Mandrake.
You'll find Slack much more pleasing.
VectorLinux is a version of Slackware with some more newbie tools, geared for slower machines. Check out that one, too.
Though all distros can be tailored to run very fast, some work better than others out of the box. Slack is one of them.
--Shade
|
|
|
08-31-2004, 09:30 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, England
Distribution: Gentoo, IPCop
Posts: 54
Rep:
|
If you've got an old box, you may need to make prefetch go away. It's great on fast new boxen, but on older slower boxen it loads a lot of stuffinto ram you don't always want there. See this thread for a discussion on prelink:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...55#post1145555
This may help.
My other reccomendation to get shit hot performance on an old box, yet stil have the latest packages, is to get your hands on gentoo. If you have a few weeks or a faster computer you can use to run distcc, you should seriously consider starting from the ground up, compileing and installing exactly what you want on it
I had a P90 with initially 32mb ram, eventually upgraded to 96 mb of ram running suse 6.3, and I used that and star office up untill 2001! I managed to get the overworked little box to produce all my GCSE and Alevel coursework. Once i've got distcc up and running i intend to rescue the old P90 for noslalgia's sake. It's acutally running Ipcop as a reasonably decent firewall at the moment, but it's not got enough ram to be a halfway decent proxy.....
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|