Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey all. I'm just curious about what everyone's favorite filesystem is: ext2, ext3, reiserfs,.... whichever is your fav!
Personally I use the oldschool ext2 fs, but I might repartition with ext3 and reinstall. Actually, scratch that, I've heard some good things about reiserfs, maybe I should check that out too! Besides, I like the idea of upgrading the filesystem tree without reformatting the disk.
Tell the world how you feel and why you feel the way you do!
One vote for ReiserFS. Why? Well, it has always worked well for me and I don't see any reason to use something else. I haven't tried v4 yet but someday!
I think they all do the job the same but in different ways.. I pick ext3 cause well, most choose it by default during install and I'm lazy. As long as it has journaling, it works for me, I'm not picky..
You know you can convert ext2 to ext3 without re-installing?
You can? That's alright, I just wiped my Windows partition (kind of similar to wiping my ass, since they both deal with crap ) I installed Reiser FS on both of my hardrives and it seems to be working great!
another vote for ReiserFS by me, reason: ext2/3 corrupted (it was during a install (one of the first distros i tried, didn't really lose anything, but it was annoying), so i kind of hate ext2/3 a lot now, ReiserFS has never failed me tho.
with version 4, it pretty much has every file system beat i think, even ntfs.
Personally though, the only advantage to using reiserfs to me is that it handles larger directories better and keeps the smaller files smaller on the filesystem. With hard disk space these days being very cheap, you can use either and probably not find much advantages and disadvantages.
And I don't see Slackware having Reiser as the default, Pat just made it so it starts at the bottom of the selections of the 3.. ext2, ext3 and reiserfs...
Using JFS on all my partitions now.
It performs well in all kinds of file operations (though it doesn't shine on any) and is even faster than reiserfs with large dirs (at least with my hw) ++ its not as loud
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.