Open Source Initiative bans co-founder, Eric S Raymond
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
Open Source Initiative bans co-founder, Eric S Raymond
Well, I attempted to post this to Linux News the other day and either it has not been reviewed or was not found to be news worthy, so here goes:
Quote:
Last week, Eric S Raymond (often known as ESR, author of The Cathedral and the Bazaar, and co-founder of the Open Source Intiative) was banned from the Open Source Intiative (the “OSI”).
Specifically, Raymond was banned from the mailing lists used to organize and communicate with the OSI.
For an organization to ban their founder from communicating with the group (such as via a mailing list) is a noteworthy move.
The effect – the intended effect – is to diminish the prestige and autonomy of people who do the work – write the code – in favor of self-appointed tone-policers. In the process, the freedom to speak necessary truths even when the manner in which they are expressed is unpleasant is being gradually strangled.
Free software as a guiding principle has been effectively killed and its founder silenced ... don't kid yourself, it is over.
Now its lesser offspring, Open Source, is being strangled as well.
Truth will assert itself in the end, but usually with accumulated explosive pressure.
Honestly, I think it's both unnecessary and perhaps even dangerous to speculate about this prior to even knowing exactly what's happening behind the scenes. There are a ton of possible motivations, and don't forget that ESR has been, quite frankly, an abrasive blowhard for years now. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he just finally crossed the line.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:09 PM Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:
> Here is everything you need to know about the ESD:
>
> * Its originator is a toxic loonytoon who believes "show me the code"
> meritocracy is at best outmoded and in general a sinister supremacist
> plot by straight white cisgender males.
I'd submit that such a distribution list is for discussing, criticising, attacking ideas and concepts, even with ESR's colourful language, but not for personal attacks like toxic loonytoon. My guess is that this and perhaps a history of earlier personal attacks led to the ban.
The secret tribunal that came to this decision seems to be counter to the idea of "open", though. But perhaps "open" is strictly limited to "source", not to decision-making.
I do not have an opinion about this case, and maybe it's my conservative upbringing (in terms of etiquette and politeness, that is), but I find some the high value that some persons place on having a right to be rude somewhat puzzling.
Is expecting people to have an ounce of decorum what's considered SJW madness nowadays?
No, but I'm pretty sure those folks at OSI have a pretty good idea of ESR's character, so it shouldn't come as any surprise as to his reaction to thin-skinned crybabies.
Let's face it, many talented people are sometimes abrasive and rude; Linus dealt with the same thing recently. People need to quit their damn whining and stop crying to mama every time somebody says something mean to them and hurts their precious little snowflake feelings.
I hear millennials whimpering about this stuff a lot lately, so sorry if this seems abrasive and rude, haha. It just makes me want to bellow "STFU and GTFO!"
No, but I'm pretty sure those folks at OSI have a pretty good idea of ESR's character, so it shouldn't come as any surprise as to his reaction to thin-skinned crybabies.
Let's face it, many talented people are sometimes abrasive and rude; Linus dealt with the same thing recently.
Looks like ESR didn't deal with it.
Quote:
People need to quit their damn whining and stop crying to mama every time somebody says something mean to them and hurts their precious little snowflake feelings.
There are different opinions about this. Some people reserve the right to be rude. Others reserve the right to impose civility.
I'd like to point out that Linuxquestions seems to be in the latter camp.
Now, whether ESR's ban is justified, and how it was carried out, are topics that can be discussed. I don't think the OSI handled this well, but I don't know the history, so I should be silent.
Lunduke makes an interesting point about the apparent lack of a smoking gun in the mailing list's archives, and OSI's reluctance to specify the "offensive emails" they referred to. If it was the "toxic loonytoon" comment then I'm surprised they chose to ban rather than warn - but I don't follow the list in question.
Ironically, ESR's famously abrasive manner makes him an easy target here, so I think it's worth asking questions even if we can't know the whole story. On the other hand he only just joined the list, so this might be a storm in a teacup rather than a sign of advanced rot.
FWIW I don't think ESR's tendency to shoot his mouth off is a reason to get rid of him altogether. I've worked with people who had worse traits and they still got their jobs done.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by andigena
Is expecting people to have an ounce of decorum what's considered SJW madness nowadays?
Most of humanity's greatest achievements came from people who were often not politically correct nor mild mannered, one could argue that having the courage to speak out and go against the tide/current are prerequisites for great achievement.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastychomper
Lunduke makes an interesting point about the apparent lack of a smoking gun in the mailing list's archives, and OSI's reluctance to specify the "offensive emails" they referred to. If it was the "toxic loonytoon" comment then I'm surprised they chose to ban rather than warn - but I don't follow the list in question.
Ironically, ESR's famously abrasive manner makes him an easy target here, so I think it's worth asking questions even if we can't know the whole story. On the other hand he only just joined the list, so this might be a storm in a teacup rather than a sign of advanced rot.
FWIW I don't think ESR's tendency to shoot his mouth off is a reason to get rid of him altogether. I've worked with people who had worse traits and they still got their jobs done.
People need to get over themselves, there is nothing wrong with telling someone they F*cked up and should know better. We need to encourage/demand the highest levels of achievement and deter mediocre results. Ever wonder why we no longer produce Michelangelo's, Lao Tzu's, Zhang Heng, Moses etc...
People need to get over themselves, there is nothing wrong with telling someone they F*cked up and should know better. We need to encourage/demand the highest levels of achievement and deter mediocre results. Ever wonder why we no longer produce Michelangelo's, Lao Tzu's, Zhang Heng, Moses etc...
In general, I agree. I LIKE when people are willing to not be all PC about everything, it makes things INTERESTING!!! But for the most part, ESR probably did take it a bit far quite often. But given how long he had done so, does it really make sense for them to suddenly start caring? Not like he was any worse than usual, IMO.
People need to get over themselves, there is nothing wrong with telling someone they F*cked up and should know better. We need to encourage/demand the highest levels of achievement and deter mediocre results. Ever wonder why we no longer produce Michelangelo's, Lao Tzu's, Zhang Heng, Moses etc...
What a terrible argument. We certainly still produce people who do great things, likely at higher rates than before because people are less likely to die of an incurable disease at 40. Furthermore, the people you cited stand out significantly - the reason it feels like their periods were better is because the loads of garbage that were certainly produced were too terrible to survive the torrent of time; in 4020, the sentient beings inhabiting the earth will think the 2020s were an amazing period for art, philosophy, and science because the hordes of DeviantArt Sonic OCs, gazillions of fallaciously nostalgic web forum posts like this one, and Flat Earth Society meeting transcripts will have been lost.
I'm tired of fake intellectuals bemoaning the woes of modern society when they are the real problem. The countless blog posts about how all modern art is just shapes and millenials are too sensitive are far more intellectually barren and oversensitive than modern art and "social justice warriors."
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by andigena
What a terrible argument. We certainly still produce people who do great things, likely at higher rates than before because people are less likely to die of an incurable disease at 40. Furthermore, the people you cited stand out significantly - the reason it feels like their periods were better is because the loads of garbage that were certainly produced were too terrible to survive the torrent of time; in 4020, the sentient beings inhabiting the earth will think the 2020s were an amazing period for art, philosophy, and science because the hordes of DeviantArt Sonic OCs, gazillions of fallaciously nostalgic web forum posts like this one, and Flat Earth Society meeting transcripts will have been lost.
I'm tired of fake intellectuals bemoaning the woes of modern society when they are the real problem. The countless blog posts about how all modern art is just shapes and millenials are too sensitive are far more intellectually barren and oversensitive than modern art and "social justice warriors."
Regarding the lifespan argument that is relative to the culture and society you are referencing, not all are as short lived as the west was.
I agree there is a tendency wax nostalgic for the past, however, that is not always the correct assessment. There is clearly a downward slide in society in general, and specifically this is noted in different time periods in the past/present when tyranny is planting its seeds. One must always guard against two virulent tyrants: censorship/restriction/legislation of speech which leads to the censorship/restriction and legislation of thought. This is apparent with incidents similar to ESR, RMS, Torvalds and (OT) but also the removal and destruction of historical statues just because the memory may offend someone. If we attempt to cleanse the past and remove our mistakes from history then we surely will repeat them. History is to be learned from not forgotten. History is more often then not cyclical rather then linear, the circle is far more powerful then the square or line.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.