LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-11-2015, 12:46 PM   #1
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Microsoft's new secure boot strategy will suit Linux firms


Hi,

Microsoft's new secure boot strategy will suit Linux firms;
Quote:
Linux companies Red Hat, SUSE and Canonical will benefit from the decision by Microsoft to suggest that OEMs not provide a means of turning off secure boot on PCs running Windows 10.

Microsoft made its intentions known during its WinHEC conference in Shenzhen, China, in March, when it announced that in the case of hardware that was installed with Windows 10, it would be leaving the choice of having a means to turn off secure boot up to the vendor.
Personally, I cannot see vendors excluding buyers. Wait & see!
Hope this helps.
Have fun & enjoy!
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:03 PM   #2
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
Say goodbye to open source when that happens...

Quote:
Linux companies Red Hat, SUSE and Canonical will benefit
Why am I not surprised at this intentional power grab?

Yes, vendors will have the option, but when they alienate consumers, they'll be screwed themselves.

Last edited by ReaperX7; 05-11-2015 at 05:07 PM.
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:33 PM   #3
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,219

Rep: Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309Reputation: 5309
Quote:
Linux companies Red Hat, SUSE and Canonical will benefit from the decision by Microsoft to suggest that OEMs not provide a means of turning off secure boot on PCs running Windows 10.
Uhm, there was no such decision as far as we know. "We" includes the author of the article.

Quote:
when it announced that in the case of hardware that was installed with Windows 10, it would be leaving the choice of having a means to turn off secure boot up to the vendor.
That's what actually was announced. Quite different from the previous sentence, n'est pas?

From the article:

Quote:
Microsoft was as evasive as it is usually. Initially, it was "I've passed this onto the Microsoft team who will be in touch."
I assume that was an editorial error?

I hesitate to say "stop pretending that ITWire exists", but that's a good rule the vast majority of the times. Such as this time.

Last edited by dugan; 05-11-2015 at 05:50 PM.
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:41 PM   #4
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,923

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Member response

Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Say goodbye to open source when that happens...

Why am I not surprised at this intentional power grab?

Yes, vendors will have the option, but when they alienate consumers, they'll be screwed themselves.
I do not believe open source will disappear. Where there is will there will be a way. If Microsoft dictates to the vendor then you will see anti-trust issue(s) here and abroad. Just look at IBM and AT&T for the problems created by their companies. Microsoft has already been taken to task by the European legal communities. I would expect the legalities of this will be challenged here and abroad if Microsoft tries to dictate the closing of the hardware to benefit their interests.
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:53 PM   #5
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,119

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
When Win8 first came out there was this same ambiguity re secure-boot. And M$oft wouldn't clear it up. I went in to a shop and asked to get into the "BIOS" to check if I could turn it off before buying. Nope.
So I bought two Win7 versions of essentially the same hardware they were "fire-saling" for half price. Still got them - never went to Win8 at all. Will update them to Win10 one day and bypass all the angst.
 
Old 05-12-2015, 09:38 AM   #6
fatmac
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,478

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If a manufacturer doesn't offer choice it will die, they know lots of people use other O/S such as Linux & BSD.

I, for one, do not buy a new machine with an installed O/S, as I intend to use F.O.S.S. always.
 
Old 05-12-2015, 10:22 AM   #7
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,923

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Member response

Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00 View Post
When Win8 first came out there was this same ambiguity re secure-boot. And M$oft wouldn't clear it up. I went in to a shop and asked to get into the "BIOS" to check if I could turn it off before buying. Nope.
So I bought two Win7 versions of essentially the same hardware they were "fire-saling" for half price. Still got them - never went to Win8 at all. Will update them to Win10 one day and bypass all the angst.
That would be a rare machine since disabling 'secure boot' is required to update Win8/8.1
Do you remember the manufacture of that machine?

EDIT: you would still need to install a win8/8.1 to upgrade to 10 or would you be doing a licensed win 10 install.

Last edited by onebuck; 05-12-2015 at 10:24 AM.
 
Old 05-12-2015, 07:14 PM   #8
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,119

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
ASUS probably, as the Win7 ones are.
M$oft announced they expect to upgrade all Win[78] users for free - if you do it within 12 months of announcement. There are likely to be continuing support kickers in that though - wait for the news in about a year ...
 
Old 05-12-2015, 09:12 PM   #9
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,923

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Member response

Hi,

Be sure to keep a tag on that since you may want to upgrade and if you miss the target date then MS will just say "Sorry".
 
Old 05-13-2015, 07:52 PM   #10
Arcosanti
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ USA
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 kernel 4.1.13 gcc 4.8.2
Posts: 246

Rep: Reputation: 22
This is the tightening of the UEFI secure boot noose. My understanding is that Win 10 is supposed to be the last release of Windows. If Microsoft intends on excluding other OS'es then they will see to it this time around. Hopefully someone will make patched UEFI images that will allow Other OS'es to boot. Kind of like what happened when some of the older IBM Thinkpad laptop BIOS'es got patched to disable IBM's wifi card white list.
 
  


Reply

Tags
bios, secure boot, uefi, uefi booting


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Microsoft's new secure boot strategy will suit Linux firms LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-07-2015 09:20 AM
LXer: Secure boot: Linux is at Microsoft's mercy LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-28-2013 04:20 AM
LXer: Secure boot: Microsoft shows up Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-14-2012 11:41 AM
LXer: Linux Heavyweights Develop Secure Boot Strategy LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-03-2011 10:20 PM
LXer: GPLv2 copyright suit targets 14 firms LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-15-2009 11:20 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration