Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
01-24-2006, 04:26 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 204
Rep:
|
Mandriva 64-bit or 32-bit?
Does anyone know if the 64-bit version of Mandriva has any advantages over the 32-bit version in terms of speed or the efficient use of memory? My computer is running on a 32/64-bit AMD Athlon chip. I'm told its not fully a 32-bit chip or fully a 64-bit chip, but can run both kinds of programs.
|
|
|
01-24-2006, 04:54 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249
Rep:
|
To be perfectly honest, this coming from an AMD64 user, I would pick the 32bit version. I'm not familiar with how your processor isn't a full 64bit processor but can still run 64bit programs, that sounds a bit off. But unless your really familiar with Linux, i'd go 32bit. Stuff like flash and java aren't fully 64bit compatiable yet. So they require a walk around after getting your system up.
|
|
|
01-24-2006, 05:00 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
What CPU does it have? The amd's are a 64 bit chip that run 32 bit...
Advantages... Well ram use especially above 1 gig and extra registers. Some speed advantages, but nothing major. The 64 bit chips run 32bit OS's really well and quick...
Disadvantages... some binary software compatibility (I can't get some stuff like my UPS software to run on the 64bit OS). I have other 32 bit softwre running tho, like 32 bit firefox 1.5... You need to match the 64 and 32 bit stuff which is an extra hassle.
I have mandriva 2006 x86_64 running here without too many problems... Certainly very quick on some things, but not noticeable on normal tasks...
|
|
|
01-24-2006, 09:25 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Bay
Distribution: Zenwalk, OpenBSD, Slackware
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amosf
What CPU does it have? The amd's are a 64 bit chip that run 32 bit...
Advantages... Well ram use especially above 1 gig
|
It's actually 4GB of RAM that's the 32-bit limit.
|
|
|
01-24-2006, 09:40 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
If you use the correct kernel options, but there are odd issues with getting the full 1 gig at times with 32bit. With 64bit you don't have the memory model issues...
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 09:55 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Bay
Distribution: Zenwalk, OpenBSD, Slackware
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
That doesn't sound like it has anything to do with the processor type, more like a kernel option called "high memory" in kernel configuration.
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 12:00 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249
Rep:
|
Anyone here actually have 4G (or more of ram) that that particular feature of having a 64-bit processor would matter? I know I don't know anyone.
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 01:28 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
My only point was that with the 64 bit machines there isn't a 'high memory' option. 1gig, 4gig, more, it's all the same...
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 03:33 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 204
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I guess what I'm asking is if the benefits of a 64 bit systems outweigh the hassles that it seems to have in a world that's not fully 64 bit yet?
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 05:12 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249
Rep:
|
I think so yes, the performance that can be gained by using a 64 bit distro is definatly worth it. Especially if your compiling a lot of data or something else that requires alot of computing power.
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 06:01 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
It depends on the software you want to run. I haven't had too much trouble running 64 bit here, but then the performance increase isn't major for day to day apps. My main reason for going to 64 was to have a look at it and get used to it as it is the future. The change is coming so I might as well go there now as later...
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|