LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2002, 10:03 PM   #1
frankprogramer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Linux vs BSD


Linux vs BSD
Which is better and why?
Keep in mind that freebsd is open-source as well.
-Frankie
 
Old 11-18-2002, 11:35 PM   #2
flavor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Republic Of China
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
freebsd is better on serverce
 
Old 11-19-2002, 12:05 AM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 256Reputation: 256Reputation: 256
BSD = Solid as a rock and can be very secure. Open Source but its different from GPL which I think makes it less popular than Linux.

Linux = Very popular, more software available, GPL'd, stable, can be secure, and very versitile ( runs on almost everything )
 
Old 11-20-2002, 08:43 AM   #4
stickman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,552

Rep: Reputation: 53
Re: Linux vs BSD

Quote:
Originally posted by frankprogramer
Which is better and why?
This type of question is akin to asking which Linux distro is better. The answer really depends on the comfort level and skills of the admin. Personally, I like using OpenBSD for servers; however, there are some situations (ie CPU intensive apps requiring multiple processors) where I'd go with something else.
 
Old 11-20-2002, 11:08 AM   #5
leed_25
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: san francisco
Distribution: freebsd
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 17
here's a nice little piece about the BSD family.
,----[ http://discuss.extremetech.com/n/mai...tart&msg=19561 ]
| In contrast, BSD is certified under a truly free license which leaves
| anyone free to do whatever he or she wishes with the code, including
| make money by licensing it or use it as part of another work. The
| minor restrictions imposed by the BSD license apply not to what may be
| done with the code, but rather what may be done to the developer. (The
| previous developer may not be held liable for errors, or -- under some
| versions of the license -- be deprived of credit for his or her work.)
`----
 
Old 11-20-2002, 11:21 AM   #6
Calum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 30
however the BSD licence also allows people to take your code, change it a bit, then redistribute it as closed source binaries and make a packet off of it.

edit - you did just say this but i meant that the GPL allows people to retain the ownership and control over even open source stuff.

surely this question is really GPL vs BSD licence, which is as moot as BSD vs Linux...

Last edited by Calum; 11-20-2002 at 11:24 AM.
 
Old 11-20-2002, 12:39 PM   #7
bubba169
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 176

Rep: Reputation: 31
I haven't used BSD yet so I don't know which one is better but I heard that Mac OS X is BSD at the core so it must be good in its use. I have heard that Mac OS X is the way to go and when I saw a screenshot of it I noticed that the top of the Window said /usr/sbin I as like whoa Linux then I discoverd that it was BSD, so how much similarity is there between Linux & BSD?

Bubba169
 
Old 11-20-2002, 01:02 PM   #8
yadavankur
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Jaipur
Distribution: muLinux
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have even heard that at its core even LiNUX uses some code from BSD now that makes BSD still more better (if what I have read is true). Since immitation is best form of flattery
 
Old 11-20-2002, 03:41 PM   #9
llama_meme
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: London, England
Distribution: Gentoo, FreeBSD
Posts: 590

Rep: Reputation: 30
Code goes both ways between the two, I think. For example, FreeBSD uses Linux's floating point emulation in its kernel, and I think some of its drivers have been developed from Linux code.

As for which is best, I personally prefer BSD because of the ports system, and because the source of the base operating system is managed by a single group of people. This makes it very easy to install and upgrade stuff. Linux has made a lot more advances in the ease of use department, however (although I find FreeBSD a very logical and tidy system - more so than Linux).

Alex
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bsd or linux? devanh General 6 09-25-2005 08:31 PM
Linux vs. BSD dlublink General 7 02-28-2005 07:29 AM
Linux Vs. BSD Grenadier Linux - General 6 02-21-2004 09:50 PM
Linux and BSD... j0hn0n1 *BSD 6 01-08-2003 12:39 PM
Choose Free BSD or Open BSD? Which one? explorer1979 *BSD 5 12-15-2002 12:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration