LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2010, 10:02 PM   #1
noelc
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 103

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux system crash


Can you help.

I have been useing Linux (Ubuntu) for a while now and recently updated to the latest version of Ubuntu.

Now I can NOT boot up my PC I,m getting the following error message during the booting process

mount:mounting none on /dev failed: No such device

Please help
 
Old 05-07-2010, 01:07 AM   #2
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
That's not a crash, it's a boot failure.

You may get better replies if you make the thread title more meaningful, something like "ubuntu upgrade: mount fails on boot"
 
Old 05-07-2010, 06:05 AM   #3
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro
Posts: 1,791

Rep: Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by noelc View Post
Can you help.

I have been useing Linux (Ubuntu) for a while now and recently updated to the latest version of Ubuntu.

Now I can NOT boot up my PC I,m getting the following error message during the booting process

mount:mounting none on /dev failed: No such device

Please help
corrupt /etc/fstab?? just a guess
 
Old 05-07-2010, 07:18 AM   #4
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockDoctor View Post
corrupt /etc/fstab?? just a guess
Good guess. "none" is used for the usb file system, something like
Code:
none            /proc/bus/usb  usbfs       devgid=765,devmode=664     0 0
but the devgid value in that line will not be correct for ubuntu. Anybody know what ubuntu uses?

If fstab is corrupt the solution will be to try booting to single user mode (assuming the fstab entry for / is still OK and ubuntu's unusual version of single user mode allows it) or to boot a Linux from other media such as an installation or Knoppix CD-or-DVD, mount the ubuntu / in write mode and edit fstab to fix.
 
Old 05-07-2010, 08:32 AM   #5
Laurens73
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Zeewolde, Flevoland NL
Distribution: Debian squeeze (Gnome) on netbooks; Debian Lenny on servers and Debian wheezy (XFCE) on new laptops
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 23
I compared the fstab with my running system over here, and no line in /etc/fstab points to /proc/bus/usb anymore. This is a 9.10 (Karmic Koala) machine btw.

Other Ubuntu users seem to use the next settings with 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope):
Code:
none /proc/bus/usb usbfs devgid=123,devmode=664 0 0
But if you want to see what the group ID of a certain group is to let users get access to a usb device, looking in /etc/group should give the correct information.

Last edited by Laurens73; 05-07-2010 at 08:34 AM. Reason: Language / typing errors
 
Old 05-07-2010, 08:54 AM   #6
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurens73 View Post
I compared the fstab with my running system over here, and no line in /etc/fstab points to /proc/bus/usb anymore. This is a 9.10 (Karmic Koala) machine btw.
Maybe the problem is that it is no longer required but has not been cleanly removed from the fstab.
 
Old 05-07-2010, 01:06 PM   #7
Laurens73
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Zeewolde, Flevoland NL
Distribution: Debian squeeze (Gnome) on netbooks; Debian Lenny on servers and Debian wheezy (XFCE) on new laptops
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by catkin View Post
Maybe the problem is that it is no longer required but has not been cleanly removed from the fstab.
At least it's a thing noelc can try: either removing or quoting the line or replacing it for a suitable one like above. In my fast search I haven't found a bug issue at the official Ubuntu sites related to this one.
 
Old 05-07-2010, 02:28 PM   #8
brucehinrichs
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: US
Distribution: Debian Sid; Sabayon, UbuntuStudio, Slackware-multilib 13.1, Peppermint Ice, CentOS
Posts: 575

Rep: Reputation: 69
Comment it out and reboot; or comment it out,replace with the above (in case it really is needed); then reboot?
Either way, I would comment it instead of removing or replacing, you can delete it later, when you get it working.

Last edited by brucehinrichs; 05-07-2010 at 02:29 PM.
 
Old 05-08-2010, 02:32 AM   #9
noelc
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 103

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
boot failure

Guys I appreciate the comments but I must admit I not that experienced with Linux to understand how to action your proposed solutions
 
Old 05-09-2010, 11:31 AM   #10
brucehinrichs
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: US
Distribution: Debian Sid; Sabayon, UbuntuStudio, Slackware-multilib 13.1, Peppermint Ice, CentOS
Posts: 575

Rep: Reputation: 69
Posting the output of
Code:
cat /etc/fstab
would help. And please wrap the output in [CODE][CODE] tags (it's easier to read). To do that click on 'Post Reply' (as opposed to 'Quick Reply). In this mode you'll have a toolbar available. The [CODE] tags are the '#' sign button.
 
Old 05-09-2010, 12:02 PM   #11
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by noelc View Post
Guys I appreciate the comments but I must admit I not that experienced with Linux to understand how to action your proposed solutions
Can you use GRUB to choose "singe user mode" (or something like that)?

Is the failed OS on this computer the only one that is capable of mounting the ubuntu / file system?

If so you will need to boot something else that can mount it so you can look at and edit /etc/fstab. That may be possible using an ubuntu installation CD-or-DVD. If not then you could boot something like a Knoppix DVD.

Please tell us which part of these ideas you do not understand and what you do understand.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
system crash anurak Red Hat 1 06-16-2006 09:48 AM
System crash Dauer Linux - Hardware 1 09-14-2004 03:06 PM
system crash masand Linux - General 6 01-21-2004 08:56 PM
System Crash linuxfond Linux - Newbie 2 04-09-2003 06:42 AM
SYSTEM CRASH cpersic Linux - General 6 01-07-2002 01:40 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration