Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In the last week I loaded SuSE Linux 7.3 on my computer. After a little work, everything loaded fine and all works, all but the printer(still working on that). I also have Win 98 on a different hd. Windows is on a 40gb drive and linux is on a 6gb drive. Linux seems to run slower than windows as far as starting apps like kmail and star office. Is this normal or are there things I can change to boost the speed. Thanks for any help.
One reason Linux might seem slow to start apps is because KDE itself is slow. If you are looking for speed, you might want to check out using a different window manager with no desktop environment. Switching to things like WindowMaker, Blackbox and IceWM can significantly boost your speed at the slight hassle of having to install and configure another window manager.
Could also be the hdd speed, what sort is it? ata33?
try hdparm -tT /dev/hdx
where x is whichever disc you're on
a=primary master
b= primary slave
c= secondary master
d=secondary slave
and tell us how fast it goes. There are tweaks to improve the speed, but I can't remember them off the top of my head.
Jim
The speed is 64 mb in 10.82 sec. or 5.91 mb per sec. This is after I changed the drive to 32 bit. Is there any other hints that can speed it up. That helped a little
Mine is quite a bit higher than yours. I get 130.61 MB/sec on Timing buffer-cached reads. Maybe linux seems slow because your hardware is slow. On the machine I'm on, I ran Windows for about a year. When I converted to Linux on this same exact machine, it seemed alot faster, especially browsing the internet (I use Konqueror on KDE).
Another thing, StarOffice 5.2 is known to be slow starting up. That's an issue with the program, not your system. I hear version 6.0 (to be released sometime mid-year 2002) is quit a bit faster.
It's remotely possible, though not too likely, that you're looking at a kernel bug, I'd heard of some machines that had problems with slow virtual memory somewhere around the 2.4.10 kernels. See if SUSE has a kernel update. (If you want to go it alone, get at least 2.4.17 from www.kernel.org.)
Hard drive manufacturers are famous for making large, slow, drives. Try shutting down unnecessary deamons (services) to conserve virtual memory. Another drasitic option is to use a small partition on your Windoze drive for swap. (See mkswap, swapon, /etc/fstab, cfdisk.) You could set the system to use the faster drive for swap first. But this could involve fips, and making another partition on an already full drive.
You can't get the star office 6.0 beta any more (I've heard) but you can get Open Office, from openoffice.org, which is the same thing or newer.
Originally posted by glock19 Mine is quite a bit higher than yours. I get 130.61 MB/sec on Timing buffer-cached reads. Maybe linux seems slow because your hardware is slow. On the machine I'm on, I ran Windows for about a year. When I converted to Linux on this same exact machine, it seemed alot faster, especially browsing the internet (I use Konqueror on KDE).
Another thing, StarOffice 5.2 is known to be slow starting up. That's an issue with the program, not your system. I hear version 6.0 (to be released sometime mid-year 2002) is quit a bit faster.
glock19, what are specs of that hard drive you tested and are you using an EIDE or a SCSI controller.
You know what now that you mention it, wayyyy back (like a year ago ) When I first started using Linux, I was playing TuxRacer and it was moving normal speed, and everything was great.
Pretty much same PC specs maybe a little less RAM then, but that shouldn't matter.
And now when I try to play it, it moves at ultra slow speed. I try to click "play" and my mouse can't even make it over there for like 30 seconds, really. Then once it gets there, The next screen sits there forever.
I can't really think of anything else that has this same problem, just TuxRacer.
Can anyone tell me what's up with that? Thanks.
SPECS:
Athlon 900mhz
ASUS DDR MOBO
640MB PC2100 DDR RAM
ATI Rage Fury Pro 32mb (video card)
SoundBlaster Live! MP3+5.1 (soundcard)
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 3.08 seconds = 41.56 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 5.24 seconds = 12.21 MB/sec
Excellent improvement on the buffer-cache, but not so great on the buffered disk. Why is that? To be honest, I think this is all I am going to get out of it. But maybe...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.