Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I don't think Redhat will run on those specs unless you somehow strip it down. Take a look at distrowatch, I am sure there are some minimalist distros that will run on your specs. You may need to install a minimalist window manager because a gui environment lke KDE or GNOME won't run because of your ram.
Im not sure how linux works with laptops but for a minimal distro I would recommend Vector if you like Slackware, or Damnsmall Linux if you like Debian. Personally I like Debian, but Vector has proven a good track record as well.
RAM has little influence in Linux, if you have low RAM, increase your swap space, but use mem-light programs, RAM is fastest obviously, and you want to use it extra wise when there is so little. personally, i would recommend LFS on that.
on a system with 233Mhz, Linux ran just fine, granted i never put the system in with big programs, to test it out, but as long as you use 1 program at a time, you can do all the normal tasks (just not as big).
Originally posted by SciYro RAM has little influence in Linux, if you have low RAM, increase your swap space, but use mem-light programs, RAM is fastest obviously, and you want to use it extra wise when there is so little. personally, i would recommend LFS on that.
I was specifically referring to graphical desktop environments such as KDE. Even if you use a lot of swap, the system is going to be very sluggish if you have just 16MB of RAM and attempt to run KDE or GNOME.
Distribution: Mandrake Linux v10.2, RHEL3u8, RHEL4u4 & RHEL5 Client Beta2 for desktop
Posts: 59
Rep:
My friend got Mandrake 8.0 running on 100Mhz works great for telnet and ftp, yet he doesn't use the GUI for anything more than basic programs like GAIM, Konqueor, etc. No video/mp3 etc.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.