LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2015, 11:12 PM   #1
jcamacho55
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: Venezuela
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux is mature!


I have been using linux for 10 years as a only OS! I think linux is mature! What do you think?
 
Old 07-07-2015, 11:33 PM   #2
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,624

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
one of the reasons it is not installed on HOME systems as much as MS

" Sheeple "
https://xkcd.com/1013/
 
Old 07-07-2015, 11:52 PM   #3
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcamacho55 View Post
I think linux is mature! What do you think?
Hi....

It has a ways to go still.

Regards...
 
Old 07-08-2015, 01:58 AM   #4
HMW
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Debian, Arch, Red Hat, CentOS
Posts: 773
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 369Reputation: 369Reputation: 369Reputation: 369
Define "mature".

I have been using GNU/Linux on my computers since 2008, so yeah... I would say it's "mature".
 
Old 07-08-2015, 05:34 AM   #5
fatmac
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,484

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
My computers have been running Linux & BSD since 1999.

I've had far fewer problems than when I was using MS Windows, so, I would say it is a mature O/S.
 
Old 07-08-2015, 05:43 AM   #6
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
i think the command line interface is about 100 times better and safer than any MS OS ever was / will be.

the gui, not so much. but it's not necessary for system admin.

for other things, i like my gui to be somewhat loosely stitched together, and being able to only use the things i need, and choose minimalistic versions.

but "mature" ... wth does that mean anyway?
 
Old 07-08-2015, 07:10 AM   #7
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,882
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
I guess it depends what you define as "mature".

To me it is a usable, general purpose operating system that I can put on my desktop and run the programs I wish to run. That's all I need.
 
Old 07-08-2015, 07:27 AM   #8
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
We're past its 'adolescent stage' and have moved on to 'young adult'.
In another decade the masses of current Linux users will have also
matured.
</opinion>
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:16 PM   #9
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,882
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habitual View Post
We're past its 'adolescent stage' and have moved on to 'young adult'.
In another decade the masses of current Linux users will have also
matured.
</opinion>
I will concur that the acne has gotten way better
 
Old 07-08-2015, 01:03 PM   #10
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938
Well, consider OS/X and iOS, which run millions of Macintoshes, iPhones, and other Apple-brand devices.

All of these are: "Unix."

But, does the user know? Much less care? No. Because Apple does not require them to. There's really nothing in their system that obliges you to understand how the damn thing works: it just does. And that's really what any hardware/software engineer most wants to achieve.

Android devices ... guess what ... run (a modified version of) Linux. But, once again, the owner of the phone doesn't need to know nor care. And emphatically doesn't want to.

However, does that not mean that "Linux is mature?" It's so mature that you don't know it's there. "Perfect."

Think of a computer as an appliance, rather like a car. You want to "get inside and drive it." 98 of all people who own cars never raise the hood. And 99.9% of them don't want to.
 
Old 07-09-2015, 11:46 AM   #11
jmgibson1981
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2015
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,140

Rep: Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392
Almost anything that isn't related to a GUI is mature as far as I'm concerned. GUI stuff however isn't even close... at least in my experience. Is one of the reasons I went back to Windows for my laptop. Seemed like every single day I had to fix something, regardless of whatever distro I was using at the time. Oddly enough the one I had the least trouble with was Arch.

Linux will always have a place on my server, but I'm done for awhile with desktop / laptop use I think.

Last edited by jmgibson1981; 07-09-2015 at 11:47 AM.
 
Old 07-09-2015, 11:55 AM   #12
suicidaleggroll
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 5,573

Rep: Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142Reputation: 2142
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmgibson1981 View Post
Almost anything that isn't related to a GUI is mature as far as I'm concerned. GUI stuff however isn't even close... at least in my experience. Is one of the reasons I went back to Windows for my laptop. Seemed like every single day I had to fix something, regardless of whatever distro I was using at the time. Oddly enough the one I had the least trouble with was Arch.

Linux will always have a place on my server, but I'm done for awhile with desktop / laptop use I think.
That's odd. I've been using OpenSUSE on my laptop for about 3 years now, and I don't recall ever having to fix anything GUI related (or anything at all for that matter). I do spend most of my time on the command line though, I don't use the system GUI tools very often.
 
Old 07-09-2015, 12:08 PM   #13
jmgibson1981
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2015
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,140

Rep: Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by suicidaleggroll View Post
That's odd. I've been using OpenSUSE on my laptop for about 3 years now, and I don't recall ever having to fix anything GUI related (or anything at all for that matter). I do spend most of my time on the command line though, I don't use the system GUI tools very often.
It's always little things. On the *buntus I had trouble with themes not loading about half the time on fresh boot. On OpenSuse I had trouble with the hostname staying how I set it, no amount of googling gave me answers. On CentOS7 no matter how many variations I tried I couldn't get a Minecraft server to run at boot with the systemd file, but it starts right up with systemctl start minecraft. It seems to be a never ending headache. On Arch I've been randomly logged out a few times. I went back to Windows because of Rosetta Stone and a religious library app, both of which run great on wine according to google... they just error out every time for me.

It was just a ton of hassle, always troubleshooting this or that. I could go on with other difficulties that I had to fix almost weekly or monthly but in the end I went back to Windows, got a Windows phone, love it. On a side note the Windows experience with mobile is far superior to Android I find as well, so it just works out. Miss linux on the desktop but don't miss the battle. If I could come up with decent web based management for kvm on my little server I would be set.

*EDIT* I know my hardware is good, and I checked the sha1 or md5 of every distro iso I ever used, I can't explain the troubles I've always had.

Last edited by jmgibson1981; 07-09-2015 at 12:21 PM.
 
Old 09-08-2015, 08:44 PM   #14
lab-rat
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Fedora Core 9, suse11.3 ,Ubuntu-super 10.10, Lubuntu 12.04 - 14.04.3
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 4
hmmmm, lemme think here. Linux is 24 yrs old now. it runs the root of all of your BYOD's from Android to Blackberry's. The Internet grew up on Linux / Apache. Apple is *nix also but not Linux ,soooo..... So ya I'd say Linux is all grown up. Mind you that with any GUI based system there are bound to be glitches here and there, But they are found quickly due to the fact that it is open source. But the nice thing is that it will just keep getting better and better.
 
Old 09-08-2015, 09:03 PM   #15
ron7000
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 248

Rep: Reputation: 26
my cat at 10 years old is mature.

she still barfs on the kitchen floor once a week.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux version of CRYENGINE becomes more mature LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-10-2015 06:03 PM
LXer: gThumb 3.1.4 - mature LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-07-2013 02:30 AM
LXer: Run Window apps on Linux? It just takes a drop of mature wine LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-19-2008 02:50 AM
Is matrox driver mature enough? hyapadi Linux - Hardware 1 10-10-2005 03:41 PM
Mandrake is a mature Linux OS clotter Mandriva 6 02-10-2005 03:10 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration