Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have used linux for about 2 years now but only as servers. I am used to doing everything in a bash shell. Last night I installed redhat 9.0 on my PC to try out as a desktop system. I just have a couple quick questions for anyone out there using Linux for a desktop machine.
Do you guys use KDE or Gnome?
Any good themes for either, Mine looks ugly out the box?
Whats a good media player?
Is there a better distro to use for desktop rather than Redhat 9.0?
Personally - I prefer KDE to GNOME in general - I use KDE under Red Hat. - You can get other themes - one thing to look for using KDE under Red Hat is Evaraldos icon set - try it. From the KDE control centre under Red Hat you can also change the Window Decoration and Styles to suit.
Again - personally - Mandrake 9.1 or Slackware 9 are superior to Red Hat 9 (for me)
# Red Hat 7.3 down configuration commands setup leads to several configuration tools
# Red Hat 7.3 up configuration commands
Configure soundcard: redhat-config-soundcard
Configure X server: redhat-config-xfree86
Configure network: redhat-config-network
Manage software: redhat-config-packages
Any good themes for either, Mine looks ugly out the box?
A Slicker Style. You can find it at kde-look.org. I also use the slicker icons.
Whats a good media player?
xmms for mp3's and cd's. dunno about video files. haven't tried that yet.
Is there a better distro to use for desktop rather than Redhat 9.0?
I used RedHat 9.0 for a few days then switched to JAMD. It's based on RedHat 9.0 so you can still use shrike rpms, but its a really great "desktop" kind of distro. Worked a lot better than RH9 did for me.
Originally posted by linuxturtle I have used linux for about 2 years now but only as servers. I am used to doing everything in a bash shell. Last night I installed redhat 9.0 on my PC to try out as a desktop system. I just have a couple quick questions for anyone out there using Linux for a desktop machine.
Do you guys use KDE or Gnome?
I'm a dedicated blackbox/fluxbox man! Except that I've been running dropline gnome for days now. It's synaptical's fault.
Quote:
Any good themes for either, Mine looks ugly out the box?
Dunno.
Quote:
Whats a good media player?
xmms.
Quote:
Is there a better distro to use for desktop rather than Redhat 9.0?
My screamingly biased subjective opinion is most any. If you mean a certain thing by that, I suppose Mandrake. But any distro can run any wm or ide, basically, which can be tweaked in any way and have any apps added to it. And what's best out of the box is completely subjective.
One more question. I hear alot of people saying mandrake is the best for desktop systems but redhat is the most supported distro. So if I were to go with mandrake would I find problems later with support by software rendors, rpms and just in general? If so should I use something like jamd instead? Wich is a desktop version of Redhat?
I use both Gnome and KDE, but I use Gnome about three times more often than KDE. I've not used the others except maybe once.
For media, I use XINE exclusively, from music to DVDs. I'm planning on giving mplayer a shot though, since I was advised that mplayer is capable of playing DVDs more smoothly than XINE (my copy of XINE plays DVDs rather choppily).
For my Gnome and KDE themes, I designed my own. It's not hard at all. Most of the themes I found on the net were kind of... eh... crappy, IMO.
For distro, I use Red Hat 8.0 exclusively. Not that I wouldn't mind trying others, only that I downloaded just RH8's ISO files when I had broadband and now I do not have broadband. I don't believe that I will try RH9, as its hardware requirements seem a bit more stringent than any other distribution. But hey, if it works for you, it works for you.
One more question. I hear alot of people saying mandrake is the best for desktop systems but redhat is the most supported distro. So if I were to go with mandrake would I find problems later with support by software rendors, rpms and just in general? If so should I use something like jamd instead? Wich is a desktop version of Redhat?
Personally - I wouldn't take it too seriously in terms of later support if your just trying things out at this stage - people often switch distros - try different distros out, dual/multiboot different distros - there's lots of scope for easy change from distro to distro - I'm currently multibooting - Slack 9, Mandrake 9.1, Red Hat 9, Vector 3.2 SOHO, Win98se (for games) - if I find something I dont like with one of those I tend to just use another for that situation - all my partitions are mounted fluently , so I just move around freely - Again personally I would just try out several distribtuions at the same time and enjoy getting to know thier quirks - you'll soon find a shoe that fits.
You can check out all the major Linux distributions and more at Distrowatch - currently around 140 of them :
I agree with Skyline - you may switch, or whatever. And you can find rpms all over the place - it's not like Mandrake's hurting for that sort of thing. And any distro has great technical support - LQ. RH is just the Big Cheese but it doesn't mean they're the Only Cheese. Mandrake was a spinoff of RH and would probably be better supported than other derivatives like JAMD.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.