LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2008, 06:35 AM   #1
vkmgeek
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Ahmedabad
Distribution: rhel5
Posts: 185
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 31
kernel release cycle


Hi,
I am trying understanding how whole Kernel Release Cycle happens.
Below is my understanding followed with questions.

Say, the last released kernel is 2.6.26. Everyone takes that kernel and starts development for 2.6.27.
Now, Say person A and Person B have identified 2BUGS in scheduler algorithm. Both of them will create patch independently.
1. Then, whom should they send these patches ? To Linus ? Now, what if Person A's patch and Person B's patch depends on each other. which means if I apply Person A's patch first then Person B's patch gets Hunked Failed and Vice Versa.

2. Then there will be intermediate releases like 2.6.27-RC1 and 2.6.27-RC2 and so on...... and then 2.6.27 Final Release. How many RC releases happen in general ?

3. Say, I found that just 5 minutes before, 2.6.27-RC3 release happened. Now, my further development should be based on 2.6.27-RC3. How can I get that latest source ? Is it better to get from Kernel.org OR from git URL ?

Thanks,
 
Old 07-30-2008, 07:31 AM   #2
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,126

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
This is how I see it - no guarantee that it's correct.
Each portion of the kernel has a maintainer - it is part of their job to co-ordinate submitted patches. Then they go up the tree to Andrew Morton and his -mm releases.

Linus' tree is the end of the line - he gets to see the amalgamation of everyone elses' work. As for release candidates, they seem to be (to some extent) arbitrary.

Forgot 3): I just pull the later -RC patch and apply that. They are cumulative, so you need to revert the previous level first. All in ../Documentation.

Last edited by syg00; 07-30-2008 at 07:33 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: The Absent PCLinuxOS Release Cycle LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-23-2007 12:10 PM
Debain release cycle? plesaleza Debian 20 09-01-2007 08:10 PM
LXer: KDE and a periodic release cycle LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-06-2007 03:46 AM
Is the Debian release cycle too slow? Pcghost General 15 03-27-2005 09:01 PM
Release Cycle? ubuntu-addict SUSE / openSUSE 12 11-17-2004 02:55 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration