LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-06-2005, 03:36 PM   #1
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,460

Rep: Reputation: 48
Kernel has me stumped


Okay: I was using 2.6.11, and everything worked great. But I'd got 2.6.13 sources courtesy of portage, figured it was as good a time as any to do an upgrade.

So, used my existing 2.6.11 .config file to make the new kernel, then ran "make" and "make modules_install", then manually copied the new bzImage to /boot because I prefer doing it that way.

Rebooted with the new kernel. It failed.

Code:
VFS: Cannot open root device 'sda6' on unknown block (0,0)
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: unable to mount root filesystem on unknown block (0,0)
Blast, something in the new version has broken something in my config, I think. So I boot off my old 2.6.11 kernel, and take a look.

But I hunt and I hunt, and it all looks OK to me. I start to wonder if there's a problem with the .config file I'm using. It should be the same config as the working kernel, but mistakes do happen. . .

So I try compiling a new 2.6.11 kernel with the same config as the 2.6.13. Then I try & boot it. It fails, same error.

Blast it, the config itself is at fault then, I think, and reboot yet again with the good kernel.

Or, what USED TO BE the good kernel, because now I have problems. No modules will load - I have no sound from esd, no temperatures from lm_sensors, nothing. lsmod shows nothing but the nvidia module.

And yet cross-checking shows everything to be set properly. Error messages tell me that the i2c-nforce and snd_intel8x0 modules can't be found, for instance. And yet, the config has both of these selected as modules, so they should exist & work. Right??

I have looked & looked but I cannot find anything wrong with my kernel config. But now I can't even use the 'safe' kernel without problems.

Does anyone have any suggestions on what on Earth is wrong with the blasted thing? Google hasn't helped! Ideally, I'd like to know how to fix the config so I could at least compile a bootable kernel, but I'd settle for just some working modules right now!

Last edited by oneandoneis2; 11-06-2005 at 03:57 PM.
 
Old 11-06-2005, 04:49 PM   #2
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,460

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 48
Never mind, fixed it, courtesy of a helpful chap on the Gentoo forums.

I hadn't got support for my SATA chipset compiled in. Added it in, and the problem went away. Brand spanking new kernel & all modules behaving
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 versions..stumped.. JT13 Linux - General 2 06-05-2005 04:23 PM
Stumped by LAN tireseas Linux - Networking 7 03-17-2005 01:33 AM
how to im stumped rocketgo Linux - Software 8 11-10-2003 10:10 PM
error, stumped brain007 Linux - General 3 09-15-2003 10:45 AM
really has me stumped! brunogartner Linux - Newbie 4 06-30-2003 05:43 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration