Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-16-2003, 04:30 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Distribution: Debian testing.
Posts: 143
Rep:
|
iptables - module, or built into kernel?
Hey
Is it best to compile all the iptables/NAT/Netfilter stuff into the kernel, or build it as modules? I guess they'll be used a lot, so will be loaded...
Are there any performance boosts/preferences either way?
Cheers
|
|
|
02-16-2003, 05:15 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Missoula. Montana, USA
Distribution: Slackware (various)
Posts: 464
Rep:
|
My preference is to build any and everything as a module (including iptables) if it can be done so (option exists and not needed too early at boot, like my scsi driver). Then again, I am a bit wierd because I write all my kernels to floppy, and actually boot from a floppy. So for me, I suppose it certainly is a performance issue, even a usability issue as today's kernels can easily exceed a floppy with too many options compiled in.
|
|
|
02-16-2003, 06:59 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Exeter, UK
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4
Posts: 243
Rep:
|
module, unless it's needed at startup or within the first 10 seconds of loading init, module.
|
|
|
02-16-2003, 07:04 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Distribution: Debian testing.
Posts: 143
Original Poster
Rep:
|
actually there is a way (using bootinitrd?) that you can make modules work for booting the machine, but anyways..
Another question, is the arp_tables code implimented yet? It doesn't seem to do a great deal, so I am going to remove it from my kernel for the time being?
Any hints/tips from mega gurus on how to reduce kernel size to the min? (Without nuking the box!)
Cheers
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|