LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2007, 05:08 PM   #1
envisage
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
How to differentiate between Red Hat 9 and RHEL 4.0


Hi..

Can any one let me know, why we have different terminologies ..

One beginning from Red Hat 7, 8 and 9 while another from RHEL 1, 2, 3 and now 4?

Which is more advance Red Hat 9 or RHEL 4.0 ? and what is the basic difference between the two versions..

Thanks..
 
Old 07-15-2007, 05:22 PM   #2
mhm
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Distribution: RHEL, FC
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hi,
RHEL4 is the latest version before issuing RHEL5 before about 3 months and surely RH9 is an older version than RHEL4, I didnt work with RH9 but in RHEL4 they support Enterprise works and include more features...

For more more information see www.redhat.com

Regards
Mhm
 
Old 07-15-2007, 06:47 PM   #3
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,700

Rep: Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895Reputation: 5895
The Enterprise edition is more advanced.

For your reading pleasure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Linux
 
Old 07-15-2007, 08:22 PM   #4
Junior Hacker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: North America
Distribution: Debian testing Mandriva Ubuntu
Posts: 2,687

Rep: Reputation: 61
Red Hat 9 was the last free version, then it became Fedora Core. The Red Hat name is now costly, not free, and has changed a little to reflect the change, Red Hat Enterprise Limited. Pretty hard to be "limited" (Corporate), and also be free.
 
Old 07-15-2007, 08:59 PM   #5
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,448
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553
Redhat 9 doesn't natively support SATA hard drives. You can patch it to add the proper support, but that is useless if you're trying to install the thing.

Answer: Pick a newer distro!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: With RHEL 5, Red Hat goes to bat for SELinux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-07-2007 09:16 AM
LXer: Red Hat aims higher with RHEL 5 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-15-2007 04:01 AM
Difference between Red Hat 9 and RHEL ? DJ Shaji Red Hat 2 12-23-2004 11:15 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration