How is it done that making 2.6 kernel it doesn't display full command line?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
How is it done that making 2.6 kernel it doesn't display full command line?
How is it done that while compiling kernel the make utility doesn't print full compilation line including "/path_to_gcc/gcc -I's and -D's file.c -o file.o", but just 'CC', 'LD' etc.? How could I examine "-D's" which are used during compilation? Or is it possible to enable old style outputs on the display? Where could I find explanation for possible abbreviations, something like "CC [M]" is quiet clear, but is there other more exotic lettering?
isnt the kernel completely independant from gcc? isnt it built from its own form of C no intirely sure but im sure i read it somewhere. Try the Documentation folder in the kernel source , or kernel.org
I don't think that kernel is independant from "gcc" at all. Try to compile a new kernel with gcc ver.2.xx - it complains that compiler version is too old, and wants you to have versions above 3 (I think gcc. v4.xx is the latest at the moment). But if I use the same compiler with my own makefile - it gives me the same 'old' style outputs on the screen. I actually tried to look at the Linux makefiles, but didn't see any specail setting. But I am not 'make' expert. I will try to dig up at the 'kernel.org', if I see anything on the subject.
I am still puzzled with this issue. Can't find anything on the subject. Is there any 'resedue' files left by the kernel compilation to see what happened?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.