LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2002, 02:34 PM   #1
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
gcc 3.2 and AMD???


Is it just me being a dumba** as usual or does anybody else have trouble with gcc3.2 with an AMD CPU.Did a gentoo install with gcc3.2 everything and first of all it takes forever to compile.About 50% longer than gcc 2.95.Many app's that worked fine with 2.95 don't work at all with 3.2.Opengl with SIS graphics - nice crash!
To have a little fun with that I recompiled xfree about 6 times with different flags - no way.There is a lot of other strange stuff going on, like flags being disabled by default by the compiler.Anybody got good experiences to share??
 
Old 11-30-2002, 05:37 PM   #2
qanopus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,358

Rep: Reputation: 45
Try to give the "mem=nopentium" option to lilo (if you are using it) Maby it will work. Any way, I found nothing on the internet about your problem so maby the problem lies elseware
 
Old 12-01-2002, 03:18 AM   #3
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
It's not that the system doesn't work.It's just that some things that worked with gcc2.95 - like opengl - don't work anymore with gcc3.2
 
Old 12-01-2002, 03:48 AM   #4
moses
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona, US, Earth
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
Posts: 1,152

Rep: Reputation: 49
Yeah, 2.95 was "broken" w.r.t. the C++ Standard Template Library (STL),
which gcc3.2 "fixed". Basically, many apps will need to be rewritten (a
bit) in order to compile on the 3.2 gcc. 3.1 is even more broken than 2.95,
though not in the same way.
 
Old 12-01-2002, 04:13 AM   #5
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
Most things compile fine - they just don't work.There are messages about the STL while compiling but that doesn't stop the compile process.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Opteron or AMD 64 dual core difference? GATTACA Linux - Hardware 1 10-22-2005 10:46 PM
gcc wont install, 'failed dependencies: glibc-devel is needed by gcc-3.3.3-41' TdlSnare SUSE / openSUSE 3 11-29-2004 03:13 PM
Kernel compiling: gcc-3.3 is 586, should be gcc-3.3 386 Erik Plaggenmar Linux - Software 0 10-01-2004 12:38 PM
AMD 64 bit vs Dual AMD MP 2400+ GATTACA Linux - Hardware 2 06-02-2004 05:54 PM
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc-3.2 - switch gcc version? ferreter Linux - Software 1 08-20-2003 01:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration