free software: what can constitute a modification?
In http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...g-free-759464/ , I expressed skepticism as to how relevant the fact of free software's being free from intellectual property lawsuits is for everyday non-programmer users, because they can't modify code anyway. Is there any kind of change to an operating system that doesn't involve modifying the code but would still get a user in trouble with a software company if Linux hadn't been free?
For instance, I was thinking of the change in desktop environment that transforms Ubuntu into Kubuntu. If Ubuntu hadn't been free software, would there have been any legal issues in making Kubuntu? |
Quote:
End users aren't blameless just because they're end users. This is why something needs to be done about software patents -- the risk remains that the entire idea of free software expression will go out the window. Imagine if someone patented certain common words, or mathematical equations, or the idea of a paragraph, or the idea of an idea? Go ahead, laugh, but this is on the same path as software patents -- we only need to walk in the same direction a bit farther. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM. |