LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2002, 10:05 AM   #16
Rashkae
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 15
A few more important differences between EXT3 and Reiser


Some of this info may be outdated. Someone please correct me if this is the case.

Reiser FS supposedly performs better. Especially if you have directories with large number of small files. However, unlike EXT3 (and many other so called Journalling FS), it does not journal data being written. Therefore, if there is a unclean drive shutdown, even though the file metadata will alwasy be correct, (therefore there is no need to run disk checking utility), the files themselves have a much higher chance of being hosed. (corrupt data from unfinished or interrupted write operations).

EXT3 also has the advantage of being EXT2 backwards compatible. An EXT3 filesystem can, at any time, be mounted on a computer or kernel that supports EXT2.

More swap space is not really better. Try going with 2x RAM as you max.. It won't hurt anything to have the swap space, but its' just wasted drive space. If you later decide I was wrong, you can always resize one of your partitions and create a second swap space.

Tip: If you have two hard drives on SCSI bus or on separate IDE bus, and the drives are relatively equal in performace (probably not the case, your 80 GB will likely be newer and much faster), create a swap partion on both. Linux will then even split the swap load over the two drives, effectively doubling your swap performance.
 
Old 05-14-2002, 10:32 AM   #17
Snake007uk
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Redhat 7.3
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
the whole point of having the swap on the larger and on a seperate drive then the linux drive is because if i am doing something on the linux drive and it then needs to add stufff to the partition it wont slow the linux drive as it will qwriting to another drive and only reading from the linux drive ? it wokrs perfectly in windows and you can notice the difference?

also can u resize partition inlinux without losing data ?

Snake
 
Old 05-14-2002, 11:01 AM   #18
Rashkae
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 15
Splitting Swap

Yeah, but linux aint' windows.. How much do you expect to be hitting on /usr /var? on a 5 user system, the answer is "Not a bloody lot"... At most, you may find a few seconds delay the first time you start Gimp, Open Office and Mozilla. (Tip: Never close applications in Linux, use multiple Desktops to keep everything open and let Linux worry about the memory management.)

Chances are, the vast majority of your disk access will be on your 80 GB /home where you store large files, like movies and pr0n, databases, and such.
 
Old 05-14-2002, 12:39 PM   #19
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368

Rep: Reputation: 64
I don't think this should be a problem, though. Even if your computer doesn't access the SWAP very often, if you keep it on a different disk (providing you've already got one - don't go and buy a 2nd disk specially for this) then you may occasionally notice a difference.

As for resizing partitions without damage, you can - I've never done so, so I can't comment on how. There is another thread somewhere on this site that gives a link to it - just have a quick search.
 
Old 05-14-2002, 01:33 PM   #20
Snake007uk
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: London
Distribution: Redhat 7.3
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u Thnak u

i cant say it enough or you help !!!!!
im off to build the computer and also waiting for redhat 7.3 the official release to download, coz im using the beta skipjack so i dont want to use that on the server but again thnaks for all the info guys!

Snake
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to convert ext3 to ntfs? cannot even see ext3 partition parv Linux - Hardware 1 12-31-2004 02:56 PM
what's the different between ext3 an... huno Linux - General 1 04-22-2004 01:41 PM
Ext3 Mikessu Debian 2 10-16-2003 07:12 PM
about ext3 safrout Linux - Hardware 2 05-11-2002 11:29 PM
Ext3 Half_Elf Linux - Hardware 3 05-05-2002 03:21 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration