LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-30-2003, 07:03 AM   #1
kriskelvin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: redhat
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question dual boot partitioning strategies


I want to set up a redhat 9 - win98 dual boot system sharing a 80 GB hard disk. The redhat documentation tells me to first install win98 without worrying about partitions and later using redhat's parted to shrink the win-partition to make room for linux (which is to me using win-fprot to partition first).

Yet:
1. Why should i do that on an empty harddisk? Isn't it possible to partition first and than install win in one of them rather to let win-fdisk create one big partition and shrink it later?

2. If I partition in order to install win98 first: Should i do it with the win-fprot or with the one from my redhat-install-cd?

As i rarely will use windows i want linux to be resident on the fastest part of the hard-disk, so i plan to:
- create a primary partition (bootable) of only one GB to install windows
- create a second large one to later install linux of 70 GB and at the end of the harddisk
- create a third partition of 9 GB as windows data-partition

What do you think of this idea? Any problems to be expected?
Does this partitioning system mean create three _primary_ ones?
Will ancient win98 be able to access the 9 GB data-partition at the end of a 80 Gig harddisk?

Thanks for any hints and help

Kris

Last edited by kriskelvin; 09-30-2003 at 07:06 AM.
 
Old 09-30-2003, 07:07 AM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
1. Yes - you can partition first.

2. The partitioning software doesn't matter - I use Partition Magic, myself.

Your partitioning plan looks more or less like mine - except substitute Win2K/XP for 98. I did it by installing Win OS, use PM to edit the HD to have a fat32 data partition and a blank partition for Red Hat, then I installed Red Hat.

As far as the question of 98 seeing the 9GB partition - I think 98 will see it all, but it may be worth googling for the answer.
 
Old 09-30-2003, 07:12 AM   #3
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982Reputation: 1982
1. well i guess they're just going from the angle of getting windows on there first... what i'd probably suggest is just use dos fdisk to create the right sized windows partition in the first place, as you'll be in windows world for that time anyway, and then create the rest of the partitions at redhat's leisure.

2. well performance wise i doubt there's really that much to gain from splitting it. but if you want to basically use the 2nd fat32 part as a shared area, then that's fine really. you wouldn't need three primaries, the windows fat32 will be fine in an extended area.

not sure if you're aware or not, but going by what you've written, linux will not use just one partition. especially if you are after a system of that size, you'll probably want a /boot, a / a /usr a /home and also a swap partition too. i'd suggest making /boot and / primary and sticking any others in extended space.
 
Old 09-30-2003, 07:42 AM   #4
kriskelvin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: redhat
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
so this would mean ...

So you suggest to partition with the dos f-disk on the win98-cd creating just one primary bootable fat32 of 1 Gig and leave the rest unpartitioned. Later I create the linux partitions _and_ the second fat32 during the redhat install procedure?

So can rh9 create fat32 partitions? I have the option to create vfat-partitions during installation, is this the same as fat32?

Kris

Last edited by kriskelvin; 09-30-2003 at 09:40 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partitioning for dual boot setup jdblick SUSE / openSUSE 9 11-27-2005 03:36 PM
Partitioning Dell HD for dual-boot SadPenguin Linux - Software 3 06-26-2005 03:25 PM
partitioning for dual boot setup binskipy Slackware - Installation 1 10-02-2004 06:16 AM
Dual boot partitioning mdfarez Linux - Newbie 3 01-06-2003 05:19 PM
Partitioning Strategies Guinney Linux - General 2 01-03-2003 10:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration