Does Your Primary Linux Server Have An HDD or SSD?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Does Your Primary Linux Server Have An HDD or SSD?
I use SSD for specific applications, primarily for DB storage. The DB servers are KVM virtual machines, where SSD makes quite a difference. The SSDs replaced RAID 10 HDD as storage for a DRBD device in a Pacemaker cluster. In this particular instance the HDDs had far more space than was necessary and were RAIDed for performance. As a result, just two SSDs could replace 8 HDDs and did not require a RAID controller. So in this case SSD was cheaper and provided far superior random i/o performance for the DB storage. This is not always the case, but SSD is definitely proving its worth for server applications.
Primary server is an old laptop so its currently hdd due to only one hdd slot and needing space as its my backup/vm server.
Primary laptop is now SSD, it boots and installs packages maybe twice as fast as the hdd but wasn't a major difference. Just worked out that the laptop was small enough to have a 1.8" hdd which are more $ than 2.5" and 3.5" so the cost increase to an ssd wasn't that much more.
The server is using 75% of a 1TB drive currently.
I just built mine recently. 120gb ssd with a 10gb / and 110gb /var. KVM vms on /var. 1tb spinner for data stuff and backups. I got an ssd more out of habit than anything. I don't reboot the thing often except when the power goes out which is rare. I came in way under budget building this server including the ssd so it worked out nicely in the end either way.
For record in regards to size. I have a grand total of 8gb of data to worry about, that is all that I backup. That includes my apt cache. So I could have gone bigger but the spinner will die before I fill it. Is just a file server + toying around with KVM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.