Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.


View Poll Results: Does Your Primary Linux Desktop Have An HDD or SSD?
HDD 495 69.52%
SSD 217 30.48%
Voters: 712. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 05-05-2014, 07:15 AM   #256
tibi tibi
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

system sdd, data hdd
Old 05-05-2014, 12:40 PM   #257
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
HDD, and I'm not switching until the downsides of the SSD are fixed. I need to be able to securely erase files, to load firmware on Linux, for them to be reliable and for them to cost less. As most things are cached to RAM and I've got plenty of RAM, I don't see any major benefit to using a SSD ATM.
Old 05-05-2014, 05:19 PM   #258
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackʍɐɹǝ
Posts: 1,486
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 282Reputation: 282Reputation: 282
So I'm going to give this a try. Long story short, but I needed to switch my server back to 32 bit anyway and my netbook is having hardware issues. So I picked up a small laptop to replace the netbook (Dell Latitude D430). Moved the 1TB drive from my netbook to my server and the "new" laptop had a 1.8" 80G drive. 1.8" drives are a bit more expensive per G than 2.5" of 3.5" drives so I ordered an SSD and adapter. The 1.8" drive fits inside a rubber sleeve then is clamped in place so I stuck the ZIF to mSATA adapter with SSD to a small piece of cardboard to thicken it up to where the rubber would hold it in place.

So I'm running a 240G SSD now.
Install and boot time were a little faster but overall not a whole lot faster. Even though I only have a couple G of RAM Linux is pretty efficient compared to Windows so it doesn't spend a lot of time hitting disk anyway.
Disk intensive things like installing packages are a bit quicker.

For those that still care, I'm running OwnCloud on my server with my most important documents being synched to my 'new' laptop as well as my phone and tablet and the rest is on my server. As I find I need something from the server I move it into my sync'ed folder structure.

Something big I noticed, I don't have to disable the desktop search/indexer in KDE. You know the common search term "how to disable neopmuk" because your system would just keep running the hdd and max out the cpu every time you logged into kde? That issue is gone.

Last edited by enine; 05-05-2014 at 08:52 PM.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Installing OS on external hdd w/o changing MBR on Primary hdd KvK Linux - Laptop and Netbook 7 01-26-2012 09:20 AM
Reading Linux Partitions on non-primary HDD whizzo944 Linux - General 6 04-28-2010 04:14 PM
SSD's a reasonable replacement for HDD on a desktop? drmjh Linux - Hardware 10 01-17-2010 05:25 PM
[SOLVED] Using both SSD/HDD for partitioning or is it better to just get external HDD? Switch7 Linux - Hardware 16 10-26-2009 12:23 PM
[RAID1, GRUB] Secondary HDD can't boot up when primary HDD fails Akhran Linux - Newbie 2 05-04-2006 04:17 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration