Does linux has the concept of "centered administration" ?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In Linux, NIS is comparable to Microsoft's domain model. It will allow centralization of usernames, passwords, home directories, and user groups.
From what I have read, it isn't as powerful or as flexible as Active Directory, but it is sufficient for centralized logins and profile storage.
Personally, I don't feel Linux is ready for the corporate desktop. There is simply too much software that is Windows only, but would be needed in the corporate world; though that is of course dependant on what your users will actually be doing. You could try and run the software under Wine or Crossover Office, but in the corporate environment, stability and reliability is a major concern. Plus you can't realistically spend hours tweaking a certain program to run under Linux, time is money in the corporate environment.
On the other hand, I have found Linux to be a good solution for public use computers. Machines where the users will have very little interaction with the machine, and are there to simply browse the internet and use standard productivity software (word processing, spreadsheets, etc).
Here, Linux's security design is of great advantage. Plus, since Linux is still far from common in the general public's eyes, you have less concerns about someone coming in and attempting to compromise your machines, simply because the average person wouldn't know enough about Linux to figure out how to do it.
Of course that is only my opinion, and I am sure that others will disagree. But from my personal experience trying to migrate staff machines to Linux, I found it to be more of a liability than an advantage.
It's different from how it would be done in Windows.
Have a look at the NIS-Howto.
If you want to lock things down even further you
could (still using NIS) and bootp have oly a swap
file residing on the local machine, and control the
rest centrally.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.