Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
12-04-2013, 03:42 PM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackʍɐɹǝ
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by schneidz
^ are you sure theyre not rebadged avalanches ?
|
There are two Escalades, the Tahoe/Suburban one and the Avalanch one. The Avalanche is the same frame and body just with the rear chopped off. All the GMT 800/900 share the same basic design, the frame is three sections, the front for 2wd/4x4, then the middle depending on length and the read depending on SUV or truck.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-05-2013, 08:31 AM
|
#32
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,311
Rep: 
|
I call mine a desktop, if I was a 1337 h4XX0r I'd call it a workstation. 
|
|
|
12-05-2013, 08:35 AM
|
#33
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Original Poster
|
Ah, 50 (u2 1 1z 31337 1 h4z w0rk5t4t10|\|!
|
|
|
12-06-2013, 03:33 PM
|
#34
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 7,156
|
Though it's just commodity desktop class hardware, I tend to refer to my system as a 'Workstation'. Not because of any "l33t h4XX0r" pretence, but simply because that is the role it performs (i.e. it's not doing the job of a 'Server', so it's a Workstation)
Of course, then you have the hardware classes of 'Laptop', 'Desktop', 'Workstation', which is harder to tie down. Like most folks whose system still lives in a rectangular box, mine is actually under the desk, so Desktop really isn't an accurate description anyway. Very few system units sit underneath the monitor on the desktop any more. But then, most people don't put a laptop on their lap either.
Last edited by GazL; 12-06-2013 at 03:34 PM.
Reason: spelling
|
|
|
12-06-2013, 04:41 PM
|
#35
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 5
Rep: 
|
I believe I have a Desktop. It's an intel core i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz
However, back in the heydays of SUN workstations with RISC CPUs, I did always wanted one but it was out of my reach, money wise.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|